I wanna win them all but good chance that doesn't happen. I don't know how important another win is, to me, it's really who we beat. If we can beat say Ucla, Utah, and Arizona, that would be big. Very tall order but that's why u play.
We won more PAC12 games with Embo's guys. Just sayin.Our record indicates we can't compete with young hidden gems, but we can compete with guys Mac has recruited.
I wanna win them all but good chance that doesn't happen. I don't know how important another win is, to me, it's really who we beat. If we can beat say Ucla, Utah, and Arizona, that would be big. Very tall order but that's why u play.
We ****ing fought till the end!
Facts. We tied their first stringers the second half. We even took out our starters before they did.
i think mac 2 is a good game day coach motivator etc but the fact is you cannot possibly find enough "hidden gems" on the recruiting trail to compete in the pac 12....we need jucos and to win some recruiting battles for legit 3star at least recruits....its still going to be a long road to the middle of the pac 12
We won more PAC12 games with Embo's guys. Just sayin.
I don't think anyone is talking about wholesale changes, but rather changing out 2 or 3 assistants. I seriously doubt more than 3, and have pretty strong doubts that we'll see 3 changes. There has to be at least one change. If there isn't at least one change made (and preferably two), I think the hit to fan support will be palpable.A win now would be a big deal. It would be a tangible sign that we are on the right track, which will speed up the road to recovery by helping recruiting. I have read a couple posts talking about new assistants. I don't see Mac making many changes with his staff. We need one more ace recruiter that can really sell the program. I would be stoked to see CU put up the money to go out and pick up Tosh Lupoi, Ed Orgeron, or Tony Alford.
One off of a massive fluke and one with a very senior laden team....compared to one of the youngest in the country. If we weren't competiting with everyone except USC how would your describe those games?We won more PAC12 games with Embo's guys. Just sayin.
One off of a massive fluke and one with a very senior laden team....compared to one of the youngest in the country. If we weren't competiting with everyone except USC how would your describe those games?
:rofl:I didn't think we were competing with csu. When you are as bad as we are, do you think other teams give us their best game?
It's not excuses. We did not see an aggregate improvement in Embree's teams and he was very lucky to win that Wazzu game, and probably the Utah game. On the other hand we have seen substantial aggregate progress from Macintyre despite only winning 1 conference game. Luck wasn't the reason we should have beat Oregon State and Cal. We need to close those games out, but one coach had a lot of luck, the other is seeing progress without results at this point.If Tini ' excuses = points, we would mud hole FSU for a National Championship.
It's not excuses. We did not see an aggregate improvement in Embree's teams and he was very lucky to win that Wazzu game, and probably the Utah game. On the other hand we have seen substantial aggregate progress from Macintyre despite only winning 1 conference game. Luck wasn't the reason we should have beat Oregon State and Cal. We need to close those games out, but one coach had a lot of luck, the other is seeing progress without results at this point.
Very very narrow perspectiveIf you don't ultimately get results then you don't really have progress. Ask the McDonald's CEO today.
Meh. I discount the USC game. I, pretty much, expected a blowout. But I do agree that the staff did a poor job getting them ready.To come off a bye week and look that bad in the first quarter does not look good for this staff IMO.
If you don't ultimately get results then you don't really have progress. Ask the McDonald's CEO today.
We ****ing fought till the end!
Facts. We tied their first stringers the second half. We even took out our starters before they did.
I guess somewhat important, but he will be here in 2015 regardless. That is when W/L really starts to matter.
Very very narrow perspective
It's not excuses. We did not see an aggregate improvement in Embree's teams and he was very lucky to win that Wazzu game, and probably the Utah game. On the other hand we have seen substantial aggregate progress from Macintyre despite only winning 1 conference game. Luck wasn't the reason we should have beat Oregon State and Cal. We need to close those games out, but one coach had a lot of luck, the other is seeing progress without results at this point.
Are we really debating who had the more impressive 2 win season?
Yes, because it needs to be said.
Yes, because it needs to be said.