You realize the Boise State coach whose record he beat by just 7 weeks is Dan Hawkins, right? You're seriously using that as the statistic for Leavitt being a super coach? Very strong argument for a coach being able to take us to the next level."South Florida's ascension into the top 25 from entry into I-A/FCS is the fastest in NCAA history, surpassing Boise State's rise by a mere seven weeks.[5] The Bulls achieved another record on September 30 when they became the fastest program of the modern era to reach the top 10, landing at #6 in the AP Poll and #9 in the Coaches' Poll."
...but we now know that Hawkins wasn't the coach responsible for the Boise State success.You realize the Boise State coach whose record he beat by just 7 weeks is Dan Hawkins, right? You're seriously using that as the statistic for Leavitt being a super coach? Very strong argument for a coach being able to take us to the next level.
Would you agree the goal should be higher than that though?We are even at the level where it's relevant to be talking about "getting to the next level." At the moment, the "next level" for CU is getting to and staying above .500
Would you agree the goal should be higher than that though?
That would be a great hire.Compare Leavitt to Schiano and I fail to see why some are so infatuated with Leavitt. Schiano was more well-regarded than Leavitt at the time both were in the Big East and Schiano routinely beat him (kicked his ass once even), and his 11-2 season is 10x more impressive than collapsing from a #2 ranking. And nowadays Schiano's a better DC at a more respectable program. Not arguing for Schiano, just that some's perspective seems extremely skewed when it comes to Leavitt.
You've resigned to mediocrity, that's fine and makes sense why you're happy to stick with Mac indefinitely. That's not where I'm at.
We should expect more because the AD told us he expects more....With your take everyone should suspend their donations and we should see if the RMAC would take us.
You asked why we should expect to be more successful than Washington State - if that's not a pathetically defeatist attitude, I don't know what is.never posted that, never said that, never thought that. I'm just talking about the here and the now.
Ah yes, it's the fans fault. If we would just pay up instead of complaining about a decade of ****ty product we wouldn't be in this mess. Good call.This isn't what I wish it to be. This is the way it is. In fact my post should want everyone to do the opposite. A FB program is so much more than the coaches. If the fans and community don't support it in a "top 25" kinda of way, then you are always going to be expecting the coaches to perform above and beyond.
Fair-weather fans and fair-weather donors are not going to make an elite or a very good program. The fact that many on here "withhold their donations" or season ticket subscriptions as some kind of penance to the AD is a symptom of exactly what I'm talking about; not a solution.
Washington turned their program around not just by hiring a good coach. They rebuilt the support of the program and the fanbase and then hired a great coach.
GT has missed a bowl game twice in the last 20 years. They did come in the last two years but they’re far more consistent than we are. I’m not saying we should win 9-10 games every year but we damn sure should never miss a bowl game. Literally half of college football makes a bowl and we’ve been there once in the last 10 years. I’m not asking for greatness, just demanding that we aren’t disgraceful.[/QUOTE][QUOTE.Just because of our past success? Are we a higher profile program than the team we shared the MNC with, Georgia Tech? Do you think of them as a national powerhouse? Look at the financial makeup, last 3 years record, their in-game attendance, recruiting, etc of the Yellow Jackets and you would find that we are fairly comparable.
You asked why we should expect to be more successful than Washington State - if that's not a pathetically defeatist attitude, I don't know what is.
Ah yes, it's the fans fault. If we would just pay up instead of complaining about a decade of ****ty product we wouldn't be in this mess. Good call.
Would you give him a pass if for example Montez gets hurt early in the season? Are there conditions?I think MM has to make a bowl game or CU has to move on.
I think that if MM gets us to 9 wins, CU has to fight like hell to keep him.
I think MM has to make a bowl game or CU has to move on.
I think that if MM gets us to 9 wins, CU has to fight like hell to keep him.
No. In year 6, there should be enough depth to overcome an injury.Would you give him a pass if for example Montez gets hurt early in the season? Are there conditions?
Me neither. Montez hasn't shown much. It's not like he's John Elway.No. In year 6, there should be enough depth to overcome an injury.
No. In year 6, there should be enough depth to overcome an injury.
If you only have one serviceable qb on your roster after 6 years of recruiting you’re already doing it wrong. Let’s not act like Montez is Dashaun WatsonWould you give him a pass if for example Montez gets hurt early in the season? Are there conditions?
That would be nice but it's not reality. The football program needs to deliver a good product if they want a sold out stadium and waiting lists for tickets. Waiting for some mega donor to show up or for fans to suddenly pack the stadium for a losing team is not a viable strategy.If the AD had the funds and pressure that a sold-out stadium and waiting list on season tickets could bring then they could be far more aggressive about financial buyouts of underperforming coaches. This isn't professional football.
If you look at who CU is competing with then you would realize this is a bad take. Many schools across the country pack their stadiums, collect huge donations and have mega donors support despite them not performing on the field so expecting CU to compete with those without the support and infrastructure doesn't make sense. If this school had the support it needed to compete at the highest level these facilities would have been built in 2004/2005 when the program started to tumble, not when it hit rock bottom in 2012. Many people on here just have unrealistic expectations of the program over the long term based on the headwinds the coaches and AD face. Obviously right now there aren't many excuses but just wait a couple years when RG tries to upgrade the west side of Folsom or has to fire Mac and hire a new head coach, it will be painfully obvious.That would be nice but it's not really. The football program needs to deliver a good product if they want a sold out stadium and waiting lists for tickets. Waiting for some mega donor to show up or for fans to suddenly pack the stadium for a losing team is not a viable strategy.
People want to gush about the improved recruiting, but are afraid to see those supposedly talented players thrust into important roles.
Given he's yet to throw a pass in a Buff uniform, I am sure there is ample evidence of this..... I'm optimistic he's a good player, but he's not shown us anything yet but size/speed and arm strength, all of which Montez has in spades.This.
Honestly Montez (and I really like Montez's potential) should be really scared of Lytle. If that kid gets thrust into a starting role due to injury, I am not sure he gives it back.
Where will CU get money to pay for two coaching staffs? We made a pretty big commitment to him and the staff.I think MM has to make a bowl game or CU has to move on.
I think that if MM gets us to 9 wins, CU has to fight like hell to keep him.
Given he's yet to throw a pass in a Buff uniform, I am sure there is ample evidence of this..... I'm optimistic he's a good player, but he's not shown us anything yet but size/speed and arm strength, all of which Montez has in spades.
Where will CU get money to make its 2019-20 athletic department budget numbers if reduced attendance during a losing 2018 season and the resulting reduction in season ticket sales for 2019 and reduced donations for the AD aren't mitigated or flipped by making a coaching change that excites the fan base?Where will CU get money to pay for two coaching staffs? We made a pretty big commitment to him and the staff.
The whole point of the drive for 105 was to create an endowment in order to pay for AD things, like firing coaches. Donors can/will step up to the plate to help as well.Where will CU get money to pay for two coaching staffs? We made a pretty big commitment to him and the staff.
Raising money, improving fan engagement, cultivating a donor base and corporate partnerships, and selling tickets are the AD's job so are you saying RG is the problem? Fans showing up and donating are a symptom of the problem, not the cause. Besides, blaming fans is a completely fruitless exercise.If you look at who CU is competing with then you would realize this is a bad take. Many schools across the country pack their stadiums, collect huge donations and have mega donors support despite them not performing on the field so expecting CU to compete with those without the support and infrastructure doesn't make sense. If this school had the support it needed to compete at the highest level these facilities would have been built in 2004/2005 when the program started to tumble, not when it hit rock bottom in 2012. Many people on here just have unrealistic expectations of the program over the long term based on the headwinds the coaches and AD face. Obviously right now there aren't many excuses but just wait a couple years when RG tries to upgrade the west side of Folsom or has to fire Mac and hire a new head coach, it will be painfully obvious.