buffsyko
Club Member
Because when WRs and RBs are playing DB that's a great indicator. Also, what team in the country has played a stretch like we have?
Michigan state, numerous sec teams...
Because when WRs and RBs are playing DB that's a great indicator. Also, what team in the country has played a stretch like we have?
No SEC team has played this stretch yet. There are a few who have played three in five but none four in five. Michigan State hasn't either.Michigan state, numerous sec teams...
No SEC team has played this stretch yet. There are a few who have played three in five but none four in five. Michigan State hasn't either.
Okay my bad but the point is, very few teams have had the stretch we have been going through, and all of them have much more talent than we do. Here's another interesting tid bit:Take a look at Florida's last 4 games. And next week they're at South Carolina.
Unfortunately, I don't see us keeping it close. P-Rich will be primed for a big game, but I'm not sure Hansen will have much time to find him. I expect USC's D-line to dominate against our O-line. I also don't see our DBs being able to contain Robert Woods or Marqise Lee (both of whom went to high school with P-Rich at Gardena Serra). From the few minutes of the Stanford vs. USC game I saw, USC looked good.
On the other hand, Lane Kiffin is their coach so maybe we have a chance.
Okay my bad but the point is, very few teams have had the stretch we have been going through, and all of them have much more talent than we do. Here's another interesting tid bit:
ARIZONA hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
CAL hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
OREGON STATE hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
UCLA hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
UTAH hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
WASHINGTON STATE hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC.
Do you have a problem with it?
Okay my bad but the point is, very few teams have had the stretch we have been going through, and all of them have much more talent than we do. Here's another interesting tid bit:
ARIZONA hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
CAL hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
OREGON STATE hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
UCLA hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
UTAH hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC;
WASHINGTON STATE hasn't beaten Oregon, Arizona State, Stanford, Washington, or USC.
Does it really matter who CU is playing? In reality, Would the record be any different?No SEC team has played this stretch yet. There are a few who have played three in five but none four in five. Michigan State hasn't either.
Shocked that Creatini voted NO. Wonder if we get blown out will he still making the injury excuse, etc.
almost half the voters think we can be competitive today.
Well injuries didn't help but we left six points on the field at minimum. If we could convert in the red zone it would have been closer but in the end USC just has too much talent and speed.
I'm rich bitch!
So having to play D.D. Goodson at DB helped us?4 RED ZONE CHANCES 10 POINTS out of 28, could have been much closer, but i'll stop trashing brown when you stop with the injuries.
So having to play D.D. Goodson at DB helped us?
Because we don't have anyone else to put on him. Our safeties can't be covering him every play because they need to be able to pick up the WR going over the top. We don't have the personnel to go man to man.Why is he covering usc's and one of the country's best wr's? I'd rather see a safety on woods than goodson. Like I said, I'll stop when you stop.
Because we don't have anyone else to put on him. Our safeties can't be covering him every play because they need to be able to pick up the WR going over the top. We don't have the personnel to go man to man.
I'm fine with that but for now, injuries have caused this season to be a worst case scenario.3 more weeks until the excuses are over. All these injured db's will be back next year.
well, all the injured db's will be back and he had better recruit some bcs level db's then eh?I'm fine with that but for now, injuries have caused this season to be a worst case scenario.
I'm sure I already answered that and no one is disagreeing about next year.well, all the injured db's will be back and he had better recruit some bcs level db's then eh?