Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

promoted It's National Signing Day!

I'm thankful for the good finish to the class. We're still 11th in the average star rankings with a 2.76. However, that is only .2 away from 7th. So, not great but not bad.

In hindsight, I would have liked to see us wait to offer some of the players we got early on and maybe held off on a grey-shirt or two. The OL is the biggest weakness I fear from this class. I wish we could have landed at least one highly sought after player there.
 
Jaximus said:
I'm thankful for the good finish to the class. We're still 11th in the average star rankings with a 2.76. However, that is only .2 away from 7th. So, not great but not bad.

In hindsight, I would have liked to see us wait to offer some of the players we got early on and maybe held off on a grey-shirt or two. The OL is the biggest weakness I fear from this class. I wish we could have landed at least one highly sought after player there.
Click to expand...
The OL is going to get some kids off RS and GS/back from injury this year. The staff must feel pretty good about the guys they had that didn't play last year. Agree a big time OL would have been nice, but I think OL and DL are going to be the focus of next class. Just need CU to get to mediocre this year (6-6) and things should turn for us.
 
Jaximus said:
I'm thankful for the good finish to the class. We're still 11th in the average star rankings with a 2.76. However, that is only .2 away from 7th. So, not great but not bad.

In hindsight, I would have liked to see us wait to offer some of the players we got early on and maybe held off on a grey-shirt or two. The OL is the biggest weakness I fear from this class. I wish we could have landed at least one highly sought after player there.
Click to expand...
We were the second to last P5 school to get a verbal comment this offseason. So there is that.
 
Jaximus said:
I'm thankful for the good finish to the class. We're still 11th in the average star rankings with a 2.76. However, that is only .2 away from 7th. So, not great but not bad.

In hindsight, I would have liked to see us wait to offer some of the players we got early on and maybe held off on a grey-shirt or two. The OL is the biggest weakness I fear from this class. I wish we could have landed at least one highly sought after player there.
Click to expand...
My thoughts exactly. CU needed playmakers at the skill positions, WR, RB and QB. Huntley, Winfree and maybe Julmisse could be immediate contributors at WR. RB Bisharata will be a great addition. Webb should be an immediate upgrade at QB.

CU loaded up on DL last year, Tuiloma, Umu, Tonz, and Topou returns as does Franke, Lopez, DMac et al., but adding Jones, Davis and Pookie at LB should be a big help to a position where the numbers and level of play desperately needed a boost.

OL remains a disappointment.
 
Last edited:
I didn't realize this before just now, but the team rankings are now live. It used to take overnight to see the affects, but signing Winfree pushed us from #71 overall (I checked earlier this morning) to #63.
upload_2016-2-3_11-35-24.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top