i like his fire and toughness a lot. i agree he would emphasize ol/dl. and, as you know well, all, and i mean, all, of our best teams have been super-physical and been able to control things upfront. i am super-intrigued by the idea of a really physical offensive line, coupled with the tenets of the go-fast offense we run now. i think it could seriously break down opponents, especially at folsom. if you look at stanford, they win because they are tough, disciplined, and smart. but, because of their academic requirements, they don't get as many blue-chips as some of the others in conference but their system works against all the grass-basketball teams in the league. if you look at utah, they have a lot of built-in disadvantages, but they punch above their weight because they are physical upfront, against a conference of teams that usually doesn't face this type of team.
things that concern me some:
the stuff that forced him out in his last hc job has never been fully resolved. and, it bothers me. and, he's never been completely open about what happened. and, that plays into some of my other concerns. he allegedly was taking shots at mm while he worked for mm in an effort to put himself in position for the hc job if mm had been fired. that's also not completely upstanding. i get it; these aren't choir boys, but it still bothers me. and, i didn't love that he went laterally in-conference and took shots at us on the recruiting trail on his way out. all part of the same nagging concern i have abut character. ... not going to lie.
now, the big BUT-- you were right about gb being in the mix, apparently (at least for the interim gig, had it become necessary). if jl turns out to be the guy, i will support him 100%.