." I wonder what changed with Al?
I heard he was reading your posts.:smile2:
." I wonder what changed with Al?
Yeah, I have that effect on people.I heard he was reading your posts.:smile2:
I did not hear the interview. But I've heard Al and this DMack guy before. Sounds like he's trying to make a name for himself. I'd bet, behind the scenes, that Al might be a bit pissed. It'll be interesting to see how long DMack sticks around.
It's funny how Al has changed his tune on Hawkins and the program. After CSU he was up in arms. Now he is more "lets just wait and see. I've seen many programs get it turned around." I wonder what changed with Al?
Or if you're in a garage on Garfield Street.... :lol:
Thanks for the link to the interview clip. Those were some of the questions I'd have asked (missing was the "Why do you pull rhythm-runners off the field so take away momentum, turn them back in to cold players and stall drives? Why can't rhythm runners be used to maintain their hot-hand?") and I heard expected answers.
If Coach felt the questions were inappropriate, most of those could have been softened by longer pre-question discussions, but the Coach's decision on phoning in at THAT time eliminated that. He asked for little time - he was given little time, including no warm-up's, no softies. When he makes HIS decisions better, then perhaps interviewers can modify theirs.
If he doesn't feel any obligation to fans, fine. I see ZERO REASON to have any respect for the press whatsoever, but as long as he steps into their arena, then he should know what's going to happen.
I love the new excuse: "I never said that!" I wonder when someone will mention that was the team motto going into the season? And it was posted on Coach's wall but those posters have long been removed.
Let me answer this. Because I Speedy kicks as and to idea of saying someone is a "Rhythm runner" is absurd.
Klatt and Kreckman :smile2:
I do realize that Clough has this small, but rabid following in the Denver area. I never got it. I don't think he is as knowledgeable as everyone thinks, he is an asshole to callers, he hates CU, and he is a condescending jerk most of time.
The only time I liked Clough was when he was paired with Mark Moser a few years back. The Moser didn't put up with grumpy Clough, and both called him on his sports claims and made the show fun.
Let me answer this. Because I Speedy kicks as and to idea of saying someone is a "Rhythm runner" is absurd.
I quit listening to sports talk altogether when Jim Ryan was fired from the Fan. He and Mosure were a good combo. Sandy is so abrasive I cannot see why anyone likes him. He's the Jiszla of the local airwaves. He revels in being an asshole.
Again?!? Really? I thought they were on 1600 AM in the afternoon.
Klatt and Kreckman is by far the best sports radio show in the market. Two guys who have good voices for radio, know the local sports scene, can think on their feet, and are halfway intelligent. That combination doesn't work for any of the other shows.
Klatt and Kreckman :smile2:
I do realize that Clough has this small, but rabid following in the Denver area. I never got it. I don't think he is as knowledgeable as everyone thinks, he is an asshole to callers, he hates CU, and he is a condescending jerk most of time.
The only time I liked Clough was when he was paired with Mark Moser a few years back. The Moser didn't put up with grumpy Clough, and both called him on his sports claims and made the show fun.
I quit listening to sports talk altogether when Jim Ryan was fired from the Fan. He and Mosure were a good combo. Sandy is so abrasive I cannot see why anyone likes him. He's the Jiszla of the local airwaves. He revels in being an asshole.
Irony, thy name be "Buffarino".
:lol:
Well, since you can only hear am 1600 if you are within 100' of the broadcast booth or have an antenna as high as The Sears Tower
The guy did well in his one game where he got more than 4 carries spread out. Why not try it again to see if it was a fluke? He's averaging 4.7 ypc.
What do you expect to see DS do Chilly? The two times a game he gets a carry, the OL produces a wall for him to run into. I suppose he could run 10 yards in the wrong direction like Speedy, but I'm not sure the coaches would give him any more carries after he did that. Just to clarify I'm not trying to take a shot at Speedy, I really do believe he is the best back on the team, regardless of scheme. I just think DS is being wasted sitting on the bench while we're throwing 4 yard curls to Espy. I also think we're wasting Lockridge in the same way. We have to get these guys the ball. Hell line up in the wishbone with all 3 of them out there and have all 3 run a pattern.
Except that Joel is such a huge Barnett guy that he has lost all objectivity. He hates Hawkins and it is clear that he has an agenda. That is not "journalism." Sorry.Give Klatt and Kreckman a shot on 1510 betwenn 3 - 6 (if you can). I have been nothing but impressed with their show.
There is only so many plays you can run in a game. Somebody has to sit the bench. Unfortunately in this case it happens to be DS. He, as of right now, is not the #1 RB on the team and trying to fabricate carries for a second stringer makes no sense to me.
AS far as Speedy goes very seldom do you see him running in the wrong direction. He finds holes quickly and hit them with speed and commitment. DS does not have the same vision right now.
Except that Joel is such a huge Barnett guy that he has lost all objectivity. .
You see holes when DS gets the ball? Like more than one? Like one at all? You just seem to be overly critical of DS for some reason, while you're one of most outspoken people giving Hawk a break. Seems a little contradictory to me. To me they both have the potential, difference is one has had their shot, one hasn't really had their shot, yet you choose to dismiss that one.
You see holes when DS gets the ball? Like more than one? Like one at all? You just seem to be overly critical of DS for some reason, while you're one of most outspoken people giving Hawk a break. Seems a little contradictory to me. To me they both have the potential, difference is one has had their shot, one hasn't really had their shot, yet you choose to dismiss that one.
Except that Joel is such a huge Barnett guy that he has lost all objectivity. He hates Hawkins and it is clear that he has an agenda. That is not "journalism." Sorry.
Except that Joel is such a huge Barnett guy that he has lost all objectivity. He hates Hawkins and it is clear that he has an agenda. That is not "journalism." Sorry.