This would be interesting to dive deeper into. My friends dad knows him well and from what I’ve heard he is a very high energy, no BS kind of guy.
Meh, I was hoping for RG to be a little more candid about the past week and to have skipped the high road routine. Calling MT a “good man” wasn’t needed.
Meh, I was hoping for RG to be a little more candid about the past week and to have skipped the high road routine. Calling MT a “good man” wasn’t needed.
Like I said he is happy until the gig comes available. His roots run deep. Happy to be wrong if it’s to the buffs. He would be my #1 choice by a mile.That HC job isn't opening up, so unless he wants to be a DC for the next 10-15 years...
Exactly this. Even if the bridge is burning, no need to pour gas on it. Prospective candidates don't want their potential new boss acting like that.RG has a business to run. It does him no good to drag anyone down, no matter the truth.
Maybe not on Twitter, Jim.Chev should be pushing very hard for the job.
Meh, success as an OC or DC isn't exactly super correlated to success as a HC.Chev is a good WR coach, really good recruiter. Failed as OC. Not sure why he would think he deserves to be HC. I can see interim because continuity, but not permanent.
Sure, you can find examples for anything, obviously they are different, but not unrelated, jobs. But the fact is his responsibilities increased and he wasn't ready to step up. I have zero confidence one more year as WR coach changes that.Meh, success as an OC or DC isn't exactly super correlated to success as a HC.
There are lots of examples of position coaches very successfully making the jump to HC (a certain Clemson coach comes to mind).
There are lots of examples of successful coordinators failing as head coaches - I mean, seriously, this list is really long.
Basically, I don't think failing as a coordinator/playcaller is a disqualifying characteristic for a HC candidate.
My concerns with Chev, in order:
1. Is he ready yet?
2. Does he have the network/ability/juice to hire rock solid coordinators and high level position coaches?
That's... pretty much it.
Those are big concerns though.
His current twitter antics are calling into question #1, and #2 I (and I think "we") don't really have any direct way of judging.
The man can recruit 17, 18 & 19 year olds; can he recruit 25, 35, 45 and 50 year olds? (Note: in general I think the ability to recruit high schoolers and the ability to recruit adults are much, much more highly correlated than coordinator success and HC success.)
Quoting from another thread:
Speaking of, how's his buyout these days?
CJ suggests Ryan Walters on the Fan just now
Chev is a good WR coach, really good recruiter. Failed as OC. Not sure why he would think he deserves to be HC. I can see interim because continuity, but not permanent.
It's an ideal chance for a one year trial, at least. As a Clemson fan, I can attest to the fact that sometimes these situations can work out (Dabo was our WR coach & assistant head coach when Tommy Bowden was fired mid-season). Also, at this point in the cycle it may be your best shot...it's absolutely brutal that this happened to you guys, but you don't want to necessarily force a square peg into a round hole and risk losing the team. With the new transfer rules, in the very least it may be worth it for Chev to be a glue guy. If he fails, you're able to do a proper search for a head coach next year and 2020 is filed as a 'lost year' and nobody would blame you for it. All critics will be correctly looking in Tucker's direction. If he succeeds, then you may have found yourself a long term solution and you can let the momentum roll on. Rushing a new coach into Boulder before Spring practice could have disastrous results (staff leaving, recruits transferring) which could affect the program beyond the 2020 season.
Unless something changes, the only guy I see potentially being worth the risk to hire in the coming weeks is Bieniemy.
This.Stop with the interim/one year trial crap. If you want Chev promoted, he deserves the exact same setup Tucker got. We need stability.