cubuffs85
Active Member
Why can't we be Duke?Bull****. Expectations have been built. Nothing less than 30-1, I tell you, NOTHING! :lol::thumbsup:
Why can't we be Duke?Bull****. Expectations have been built. Nothing less than 30-1, I tell you, NOTHING! :lol::thumbsup:
We aren't going to settle for lowered expectations, I expect nothing but the best... Final Four or bust!Think people need to tap the breaks a bit. Beating Kansas doesn't mean we're going like 28-3.
Best analysis of the situation IMO.Right. We'll be favored in every home game. But it's damn hard to win them all.
One thing this team has to get used to is having a target on its back.
Think people need to tap the breaks a bit. Beating Kansas doesn't mean we're going like 28-3.
I don't know, you tell me.Why can't we be Duke?
I could see them start out 17-2, and finish at 23-8. Maybe slightly optimistic tho.
I assume you had KU a loss? And now Ok St? (In addition to Baylor)Sticking to my preseason 22-9 guns at this point, although I had us 10-3 OOC and now think 11-2
I assume you had KU a loss? And now Ok St? (In addition to Baylor)
iirc, he had us winning one of those but dropping the game at CSU.
I look forward to the All You King Haters...... thread
look at you!Yeah, but KenPom has us winning all of our home games with the lowest chances (right now) are Arizona @ 51% and Oregon @ 61%
Probability of winning every game at home. So say you have three games, the first you have a 85%, the second you have a 72%, and the third you have a 65% probability of winning, if you take (.85*.72*.65) you get a 39.8% probability of winning those three games
Oh gotcha, we could've lost either game, so not a bad prediction at all. We know CSU won't ever be an easy win and Harvard is the type of team that can beat us at Coors.I thought we'd win one of the "big 2" but lose to Harvard or CSU
Oh gotcha, we could've lost either game, so not a bad prediction at all. We know CSU won't ever be an easy win and Harvard is the type of team that can beat us at Coors.
Very pleased to not have been proven right. Although being down 14 to Harvard early in the second and trailing CSU with a few minutes left verified my concerns to a degree.
OK State really doesn't have any size on their front court. We all know how potent their guard play is, but this might be a great thing for us. Sure, if you look at their roster, they have Gaskins (6'10), Cox (6'10) and Soucek (7'0), but combined they only average 8.8 mpg/2ppg/3.3rpg. The only height they have on their roster that is producing minutes are 6-8 Murphy (19 mpg/6ppg/6rpg) and 6-8 Cobbins (21.7 mpg/4.6ppg/5.1rpg).
When you break down production and height between rosters this is what is looks like.
Colorado / Oklahoma State
Dinwiddie (6'6) 31.3 min / 15.5 ppg / 4 apg Smart (6'4) 30.1 min / 19.0 ppg / 3.9 apg
Scott (6'10) 27.8 min / 12.4 ppg / 8.6 rpg Brown (6'3) 32.1 min / 15.9 ppg / 3.3 apg
Booker (6'2) 25.5 min / 11.5 ppg / 1.9 apg Nash (6'7) 26.1 min / 13.8 ppg / 6.0 rpg
Johnson (6'7) 26.1 min / 10.0 ppg / 6.1 rpg Forte (5'11) 20.7 min / 11.7 ppg / 1.0 apg
Gordon (6'9) 26.1 min / 7.6 ppg / 6.3 rpg Williams (6'5) 26.5 min / 10.1 ppg / 3.9 rpg
Hopkins (6'5) 16.8 min / 5.4 ppg / 1.3 rpg Clark (5'11) 16.3 min / 7.5 ppg / 3.7 apg
Thomas (6'8) 14.5 / 5.1 ppg / 3.1 rpg Murphy (6'8) 19.0 min / 6.0 ppg / 6.0 rpg
Talton (6'2) 16.0 min / 4.1 ppg / 1.7 apg Cobbins (6'8) 21.7 min / 4.6 ppg / 5.1 rpg
Now let's look at our top five's height vs theirs:
Colorado Average Height (Dinwiddie/Booker/Johnson/Gordon/Scott) - 6'7
Oklahoma State Average Height - 6'5
It's going to be a great game and I am happy we have the size advantage.