Idot Buff
Guest
Kirk's evil twin?
whatever his ****ing name is. How about Mushmouth's bitch?
Kirk's evil twin?
Cute
What you are ignoring is the smear campaign that Bailor launched against us during the switch and they think they can do that with because they have God's backing, along with their murder scandal not too long ago. **** them. Texas ruined the Big 12, but I hate Bailor 1000x more than UT.
And yes I remember every event you described above, still doesn't make me hate Bailor less than UT. As Nik said, UT is UT. They have all the resources a AD needs, Bailor doesn't have that and if you cut off the neck (Briles) of the animal (their football team) it's going to die, and it is going to be glorious.
I hate all Texas schools.
Bama Charlie, wherefore art thou?
Bama Charlie, wherefore art thou?
Only if he needs a coach who will help Texas get an invite to the Big XII ......... oh, wait .............. nevermind.Saban is going to need Sparkles back, right?
This is the exact mentality that has allowed UT to dip since 2005.Texas should be able to dominate just on name and recruiting in state. There are a dozen coaches out there that could come in and win.
Why are you asking Bama Charlie why he is Bama Charlie?
I guess the reference to BC's close identification to Saban was too obtuse.....Need to go back to school son.
Texas should be able to dominate just on name and recruiting in state.
I'd say Texas should be at worst a top 5 program (that's not the same as being the #5 ranked program) at all times, unlike many of those other schools you mentioned. That's not to say they will be, but I'd say they are clearly above Miami, FSU, LSU, Oklahoma, and Georgia.I understand this reasoning, but give me an example where this has been true. You could say the same about USC, Bama, Florida, Ohio State, Miami, FSU, LSU, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, Georgia, etc. Every single power program goes through cycles with huge swings. Ultimately, it's all about the coach in college football.
With the Longhorn Network an ESPN collaboration...they definitely want Saban in Texas IMO
Except they (speculation) make a lot more money on their SEC deal, and have considerable financial interest in the SEC NC machine.
I'd say Texas should be at worst a top 5 program (that's not the same as being the #5 ranked program) at all times, unlike many of those other schools you mentioned. That's not to say they will be, but I'd say they are clearly above Miami, FSU, LSU, Oklahoma, and Georgia.
I'd say Texas should be at worst a top 5 program (that's not the same as being the #5 ranked program) at all times, unlike many of those other schools you mentioned. That's not to say they will be, but I'd say they are clearly above Miami, FSU, LSU, Oklahoma, and Georgia.
Mack Brown IIRC doesn't like how much Longhorn Network stuff he has to do, specifically without giving away the playbook so to speak. This could be hurt NOT help for Saban IMO.With the Longhorn Network an ESPN collaboration...they definitely want Saban in Texas IMO
Mack Brown IIRC doesn't like how much Longhorn Network stuff he has to do, specifically without giving away the playbook so to speak. This could be hurt NOT help for Saban IMO.
There's also not the fan support at USC. By top 5, I mean they should be a top 5 relevant program. A lot easier to see USC going through a lean period IMO, it's LA, there's a lot more to do there. It will never be Bama or Notre Dame, where life revolves around football.USC has way more national championships and Heisman winners. UT is in the top tier, but there are lots of schools in that top tier and none of them are always "at worst a top 5 program at all times.