No, 0.001% we go 0-9 in conference play. Road games vs. home games -- different ball of wax by a significant margin.
Sometimes I wish I could see the world through 'Tini's eyes.
That is what got me. Not the loss, I expected it. I saw OSU as a team the Buffs could at least look competitive against. They got their ass kicked in every phase of the game. Adkins was a bright spot though.amazing how bad our OL look when you see osu had 2 freshmen and 1 red shirt playing OL ? san diego st. put more pressure on the QB. osu has a crappy defense and we could not run or throw?? amazing
really hard to be positive. we had a couple of games where the Buffs looked decent. Made a couple of BIG plays to either get or keep some momentum. Now we are back to BUFF football. Calls against us, turnovers that we do nothing with, our turnovers are huge for the opponent. Like i said, really hard to stay positive.
Sometimes I wish I could see the world through 'Tini's eyes.
Well let's see...
-It's never happened in our 100+ year history
-Not even Embree managed to go 0-9 in conference
-We get Arizona, USC, and Cal at home. Cal on a neutral field is marginally better according to the updated Sagarin rankings (84 vs. 87) but home field tips that in our favor
-We will continue to improve, as will others
-Road vs home games
-Duff says it's really hard to go 0-9 so yup
No, 0.001% we go 0-9 in conference play. Road games vs. home games -- different ball of wax by a significant margin.
Since you are providing numbers, please provide your calculations on how you got to that result.
Let's just go with this link
http://www.teamrankings.com/college-football/team/colorado-buffaloes/projections
Does not factor in the make up game and the most likely scenario is 3-8 which means 1-8 in conference play. The actual number I posted is not significant, it's just stating that the probability of losing 9 straight games in conference play is very low.
Glad someone noticed.You've been struggling to stay positive??? Hadn't noticed...
Holic, I know you know your stuff. You Sir are being kind, saying we are talented and as deep as a WAC team. I really do not see that. Not across the board. I see maybe 5 to 6 players that would start for a WAC team. I also see 2 to 3 WAC teams CU could beat. Our talent level or better yet our players that truly think they can win on any Saturday is truly lacking. Until the mindset of we can lose is replaced by we can beat anybody. We are screwed. HCMM is getting it done. I just hope after this Saturday, the rest of the team is not lost.While I'm concerned with how bad we looked, I also know that it's difficult this early to judge teams. OSU could in fact be a horrible team. They also could be as good as last year. They were bad early for sure.
We have the talent depth right now of a WAC team. I think HCMM is recruiting somewhere between San Jose State and mid range lower tier PAC12 right now. If we win 3-4 games, he'll have to rely on some no name guys. I'm sure his database is full of those types as they were well into recruiting 2014 kids when they packed and left San Jose.
Statistics aside, I'd like to believe that the Buffs will win a conference game and I realize that some of them are winnable. I think a lot will depend on how the team responds to what is likely to be three blow out losses in a row. Go into the Arizona game completely demoralized and it may not matter what your link says.
Yes, I realize that I am ignoring the possibility of a win on Oct 19th.
:congrats:well said.You nailed it. All the winnable games everyone is talking about (and IMO Cal is the only one that is winnable) come AFTER we get cornholed by OR, ASU, UCLA and WA, and almost certainly beaten by AZ. I know from my HS playing days, getting trucked 4-5 in a row makes you doubt what you can do even against beatable teams.
Just because we've never gone winless in conference in our history means nothing. Those players aren't playing, these players are. Only a pure fluke prevented it last year. I just think, aside from an FCS makeup, going winless the rest of the way is very possible. The Pac-12 overall is better this year than last. USC is at the bottom of ESPN rankings, yet has numerous walkons that would start for us.
That said, I completely agree that merely showing progress (like losing 44-17, instead of 69-14) is something to build on and will translate to wins ... in 2014 or 15.
You nailed it. All the winnable games everyone is talking about (and IMO Cal is the only one that is winnable) come AFTER we get cornholed by OR, ASU, UCLA and WA, and almost certainly beaten by AZ. I know from my HS playing days, getting trucked 4-5 in a row makes you doubt what you can do even against beatable teams.
Just because we've never gone winless in conference in our history means nothing. Those players aren't playing, these players are. Only a pure fluke prevented it last year. I just think, aside from an FCS makeup, going winless the rest of the way is very possible. The Pac-12 overall is better this year than last. USC is at the bottom of ESPN rankings, yet has numerous walkons that would start for us.
That said, I completely agree that merely showing progress (like losing 44-17, instead of 69-14) is something to build on and will translate to wins ... in 2014 or 15.
This team will continue to scrap for any win they can find throughout the season. Even Embree kept resolve in the team after a 1-9 start in '11 and then won a couple, and even last year's abomination showed fight in the Utah game. It's not like Cal will be rolling into Boulder riding a streak of wins that provide confidence.
Holic, I know you know your stuff. You Sir are being kind, saying we are talented and as deep as a WAC team. I really do not see that. Not across the board. I see maybe 5 to 6 players that would start for a WAC team. I also see 2 to 3 WAC teams CU could beat. Our talent level or better yet our players that truly think they can win on any Saturday is truly lacking. Until the mindset of we can lose is replaced by we can beat anybody. We are screwed. HCMM is getting it done. I just hope after this Saturday, the rest of the team is not lost.
USC will also be rolling in with few scholarship players (albeit talented) and after playing Stanford and then they play UCLA after us so it's not like we will be the only team dealing with adversity.
This team will find a way to win one or two games in conference play between Cal, USC, Arizona, and Utah. All of those are at games and we all know our home/road splits.
You nailed it. All the winnable games everyone is talking about (and IMO Cal is the only one that is winnable) come AFTER we get cornholed by OR, ASU, UCLA and WA, and almost certainly beaten by AZ. I know from my HS playing days, getting trucked 4-5 in a row makes you doubt what you can do even against beatable teams.
Just because we've never gone winless in conference in our history means nothing. Those players aren't playing, these players are. Only a pure fluke prevented it last year. I just think, aside from an FCS makeup, going winless the rest of the way is very possible. The Pac-12 overall is better this year than last. USC is at the bottom of ESPN rankings, yet has numerous walkons that would start for us.
That said, I completely agree that merely showing progress (like losing 44-17, instead of 69-14) is something to build on and will translate to wins ... in 2014 or 15.
If you have coaches like Embree and staff that beat you down and beat you down then yes, you definately have fear in the foxhole. But, I think this staff is about accountabilty and develop a culture that includes keeping things positive and developing learning experiences.