What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

My Top 10

and some random dude from alabama has wasted an entire sunday defending a conference on a colorado message board. you are so weird.

I am starting to come around. That v tech win was huge. It is not like they lost to a school called James Madison a few years ago.

Here is a crazy thought. If CU had plated Fresno State and won. Their Ooc schedule may have been tougher than bamas. I guess it is not so crazy, they schedule like they are scared of everyone.
 
I am starting to come around. That v tech win was huge. It is not like they lost to a school called James Madison a few years ago.

Here is a crazy thought. If CU had plated Fresno State and won. Their Ooc schedule may have been tougher than bamas. I guess it is not so crazy, they schedule like they are scared of everyone.

VT is stupid good. They demolished everyone after their game against Bama. Sure, they tripped up against Duke and Boston College, but that's a really good team by non-SEC standards.
 
VT is stupid good. They demolished everyone after their game against Bama. Sure, they tripped up against Duke and Boston College, but that's a really good team by non-SEC standards.

Do you think they would beat Fresno?
 
9LSU
10Stanford
11TAMU
18UW
19barn
20UCLA
26Ole Miss
32AZ
37Utah
39VT
40Ost
47tuk
51Wazzou
55MSU
74Ark
82UK
84CSU
86CU
89Uva
108Cal
125Noogs
193GSU
198Nstate
 
Until Alabama loses, they will continue to dominate the polls. Oregon has lost about a quarter of its lead on FSU in the top polls from last week to this week and have less #1 votes than FSU in the AP Poll.

Fortunately for Oregon, FSU has a week schedule for the remainder of the season. No ranked teams and only Florida as a "named" opponent. Oregon still has Stamford, plus Oregon State and Arizona (6-3 and 6-2 respectively).

I'm a big believer in that you gain advantage when your conference does well even if you are struggling (had a hard time applying this to the Bugeaters or Shorthorns, but I digress). I would like to Oregon win the national title game and bring the mantle to our conference, so can't let them get passed by any other unbeatens, and at this point, they have to win out as Stamford's loss was too ugly to be a legit dark horse for the National Title game even if they win out.
 
You might need to check those facts. We are talking AP poll/BCS polls not the allbuffs.com ranking right?

I'm talking about the Sagarin ratings. You're talking about.. who the hell knows. I mean, check out the last page of this thread. Who is talking about AP polls or BCS polls? You even linked the Sagarin ratings, twice. Unless the BCS and AP polls extend into the 100s now? In which case, my bad.
 
So instead of scheduling real teams and proving it on the football field. Bama and the rest of the SEC would rather use opinion and speculation to prove they are the best.
 
Two questions:

1. What's the difference between LSU/A&M/South Carolina and UCLA? Why are the first three getting the benefit of the doubt and UCLA is not?

2. Why is Georgia getting at least 20 votes in each poll while USC, Oregon State, Arizona, and Washington are getting a combined 10 votes between the two polls?

These are hard questions to answer.

No they're not. East coast and SEC bias.

Of course, of course, it's East Coast and SEC bias. Which makes it rather interesting that Jon Wilner, a noted Bay area writer with an AP ballot, has A&M, LSU, and South Carolina all ranked ahead of UCLA.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about the Sagarin ratings. You're talking about.. who the hell knows. I mean, check out the last page of this thread. Who is talking about AP polls or BCS polls? You even linked the Sagarin ratings, twice. Unless the BCS and AP polls extend into the 100s now? In which case, my bad.

That is odd. Quality losses I guess.
 
Of course, of course, it's East Coast and SEC bias. Which makes it rather interesting that Jon Wilner, a noted Bay area writer with an AP ballot, has A&M, LSU, and South Carolina all ranked ahead of UCLA.

He also has UCF ahead of UCLA. Guess he's not buying what UCLA is selling.
 
Of course, of course, it's East Coast and SEC bias. Which makes it rather interesting that Jon Wilner, a noted Bay area writer with an AP ballot, has A&M, LSU, and South Carolina all ranked ahead of UCLA.

That's great. Care to explain the second question?
 
UCF is a very good team. They would be probably 4th or 5th in the PAC-12.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well then. Lets dive in here. Oregon and Stanford are 1 and 2, with lets say Arizona State or UCLA coming in at 3rd there. So, you're saying UCF is better than one of those as well as: USC, Washington, Oregon State, Arizona, and Utah?
 
Well then. Lets dive in here. Oregon and Stanford are 1 and 2, with lets say Arizona State or UCLA coming in at 3rd there. So, you're saying UCF is better than one of those as well as: USC, Washington, Oregon State, Arizona, and Utah?

UCF would beat Zona, Utah, Oregon State and possibly USC and UDub.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top