Appears police already reduced the charges to a misdemeanor.
Looks like they amended his BAC to .08 in order to drop it down to a misdemeanor. Somehow between his arrest and release he became only half as drunk at the time of the accident.
Looks like they amended his BAC to .08 in order to drop it down to a misdemeanor. Somehow between his arrest and release he became only half as drunk at the time of the accident.
Edit:
Sweet now we don't have to worry about expensive lawyers. That is probably what.The message to recruits is that the LPD has your back. I wonder what the parents think about that.
Looks like they amended his BAC to .08 in order to drop it down to a misdemeanor. Somehow between his arrest and release he became only half as drunk at the time of the accident.
Edit:
Prosecutorial discretion...which in the land of the cornchubs means protecting the FB program at nearly any cost.From a legal perspective (and this was addressed already, I realize), how does something that clear and measurable (BAC) just drop below the felony threshold? Is that permissible? If it was measured at one level, shouldn't that stand?
From a legal perspective (and this was addressed already, I realize), how does something that clear and measurable (BAC) just drop below the felony threshold? Is that permissible? If it was measured at one level, shouldn't that stand?
I did. But I didn't understand how something is measurable, to those standards, can just be changed. .14 to .16 is not .08. So I'm not sure how it can just be changed.Jeez did no one read my post?
I did. But I didn't understand how something is measurable, to those standards, can just be changed. .14 to .16 is not .08. So I'm not sure how it can just be changed.
But I'm not talking about the cultural incentives. I'm talking about the actual legal component that makes this possible.This is Nebraska we are talking about. Grand theft auto gets changed to loaning a stranger a car and rape gets changed to consentual if the the player is important enough to the team.
The way I read it is that the result of the test isn't actually changed. What's changed is the crime being prosecuted. If you blow .15, you're also technically blowing .08. The prosecutor isn't concerning himself with the remaining .07.But I'm not talking about the cultural incentives. I'm talking about the actual legal component that makes this possible.
Why, there's plenty of examples of large, concrete Stalinesque architecture to visit, starting with the Stadium and moving on to several grain silos! And that campus! Who could be bored with that?Nothing else to do in Lincoln. Gotta medicate to function properly there.
Simply put, blowing anywhere from .08 to .14 is the same level of DUI. Since there is a margin of error of .01, it can be argued that a .15 might actually be a .14, and therefore the same as a .08. This defense would not be available to somebody who blew a .16.But I'm not talking about the cultural incentives. I'm talking about the actual legal component that makes this possible.
I did. But I didn't understand how something is measurable, to those standards, can just be changed. .14 to .16 is not .08. So I'm not sure how it can just be changed.
I went back and read your post again. It was clear. I failed in my comprehension.Like sackman's said, it's only the charge that changed. Essentially, one charge is having a BAC of .08-.014, and the other charge is for a bac of over .15+.
The girl who killed the Google cyclist, too, was given leniency.I was once pulled over for speeding. I was cooperative. The officer had some pity. The charge on the eventual ticket was failure to signal a lane change. That had a much lower impact on my insurance than a speeding ticket would have had. Since it is a plea deal - and a borderline felony case anyway, they just reduced the charge. I'm not even convinced he got special treatment.
However, I'm generally very opposed to this country's lax punishments for DUI. A third DUI to me should never be allowed to happen because you shouldn't be driving after your second. There was a recent case in CO (Boulder?) where a dude went without jail time after his sixth, yes SIXTH, DUI conviction. That's appalling to me and dangerous to everyone. I don't actually care about the jail time, but I don't want these people driving. Ever. They lost that privilege.
Cops arrest people based on probable cause. The prosecutors have the burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Sometimes there is quite a bit of daylight between the two depending on the particular crime. Just because an officer has PC for an arrest, it doesn't mean that the facts of the crime will support a conviction at trial.
The prosecutor probably received the case and opted for the lesser charge because they felt that they could better prove it in court. It happens quite often that someone ends up being charged with a lesser included offense even though their case warrants the higher charge. If you factor in the Jury factor, in this case, it is very unlikely that a Lancaster County jury would convict a Huskers coach anyway. Jury selection would be a nightmare for the prosecutor.
Prosecutors don't like to try cases that they might lose and oddly some of them do their best to stay out of trials entirely. The chief prosecutor in Lancaster County is the County Attorney, who is directly elected so even if the prosecutor isn't a Husker booster, there would likely be pressure from above. I am sure that it will be pleaded down to something ridiculous.
Not to excuse any of this. I think that the guy should resign and enter treatment. It is inexcusable to be coaching young men when you have a complete lack of disregard for the safety of others and have a substance abuse problem.
That's what she said?If you blow .15, you're also technically blowing .08. The prosecutor isn't concerning himself with the remaining .07.
I've never heard her say she blows .15 with you. It's usually around that .08 figure.That's what she said?