Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

OC Lindgren

GoonieBuff said:
It looked like a planned "trick" play to me.
Click to expand...
To me it shouldn't matter if it's planned or not. I don't think a coach would get pissed if one of his players made a play if it was there despite what's called. On tv, it looked like the option was wide open.
 
BuffLuKe said:
To me it shouldn't matter if it's planned or not. I don't think a coach would get pissed if one of his players made a play if it was there despite what's called. On tv, it looked like the option was wide open.
Click to expand...
I agree to a point, but that's not what I commented on. I mentioned that it looked planned, and I don't think anyone would expect Sefo to deviate from a plan. We know that Sefo isn't the best at making those split second decisions during the game, which is probably one of the reasons that we rarely see a true zone read play.
 
White_Rabbit said:
basically "Arizona ran the ball when they were down and it worked, so we figured it'd be ok for us to do so too"
Click to expand...

I'd have to go back and listen again, but I thought he was answering the question about why they seemed to go conservative in the third quarter while up 24-17, not answering why they ran in the fourth while down 14.
 
lawdogg said:
I'd have to go back and listen again, but I thought he was answering the question about why they seemed to go conservative in the third quarter while up 24-17, not answering why they ran in the fourth while down 14.
Click to expand...

I'd also have to go back and listen again, you may be right. And that'd make a lot more sense.
 
GoonieBuff said:
I agree to a point, but that's not what I commented on. I mentioned that it looked planned, and I don't think anyone would expect Sefo to deviate from a plan. We know that Sefo isn't the best at making those split second decisions during the game, which is probably one of the reasons that we rarely see a true zone read play.
Click to expand...
I hear ya but damn, if you look up and nobody is there, take what's there. Not much to read in that situation.:D
 
Much more important to have to dedicated STs coach than to have a guy focused on QBs, especially since our QB is so fundamentally sound and strong in the mental aspects of the game.

Lindgren split between OC and QB coach and doing a poor job of both.
 
Last year people wanted him to get one of the contracts. I guess we don't have to worry about him leaving anymore now do we. Lulz
 
All I know is I'm at home and knew what we'd run. That's not good. He made some good calls and some Wtf calls. I'm not even sure what we are as an offense? I just know it's easy to read and predictable. What do y'all think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top