This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This is about competition. No way Lytle ascends to throne automatically next year. If he was that good, he’d be challenging Montez now. Additionally, is he the prototype dual threat they want? Absolutely no way (unless he’s made a monster jump)
GB is obviously very in tune with what is happening with this team and what will happen in the future. If there is someone to listen to with CU football, its him.
And has way more experience translating what he sees
I don't think they only want dual threat QBs. Like UGA, I think they want some of both.
No way Lewis is starting next year.
Thanks for clearing that up
That's a weird take.
yea, again, this isn't a surprise. Just like the DT and LUcket to CB moves, nothing to freak out over. Spoiler alert, Colorado doesn't have depth. Which hasn't changed since about 2003
How so?
Got that right.....except maybe for the "thinking" part!
A number of injuries? More than one?
Where did you get they're counting on him playing? If he's playing after practicing at safety for two weeks they're in big, big trouble.
Sam Noyer's post practice interview....he talks about the conversation that he and MT had about the switch. MT said "we could use your athletic abilities on the field". Then at ~1:55, Sam says, "you know, it's a little thin back there right now with some injuries and stuff"
He did have a nasty habit of losing the 1st game.
You're still projecting.
Nope, read my first post again. I never said he is going to play, as you seem to infer. I said that it sounds thin back there (per his quote), and "they are actually counting on him potentially playing if needed" Meaning, further injuries might force him on the field if he needs to be.
It'd be a gross mismanagement of time to not spend at least 10+ practices on prepping for the first game, particularly when it's an in-state "rival" and game one of a hyped coaching era. Without actually saying it, the game is a must win for Tucker.
There are players, but there are depth issues, especially between 1s and 2s at some position groups. This issue could affect the season.
Sheesh! Why does everybody here,long-timers included, seem to believe that this bunch is the only team that suffers injuries, banged-up players, lacks "depth" (when what they really mean is "experienced subs")....and on and on? I can see that attitude in stoopid, lazy journo types, but c'mon!
