I appreciate your future orientation. For instance, you ran a simulation, to indicate how the game today would work out. And now, rather than focusing on the game played today, you are concerned with the trajectory of each team. Always in the future. They give life championships for that kind of thinking, so a tip of the hat to you sir. I love your priorities.
Yeah, "Precious Montez" got sacked a lot today. But he finished the game. You present a strange argument, considering your quarterback didn't. What was your point there? That your lines were better than ours for most of the day--especially in the 2nd? We can agree on that.
You seem fixated on the idea that your team failed to make plays when it needed to, and that's the foundation of the loss for nebraska. However, you fail to note that CU did actually make plays when it counted. You should try to credit that. Nebraska's coverage was perfect on that last touchdown--that wasn't something you gave us. It was something we took. That takes character. When you explain that CU won only as a product of Nebraska's errors, you're simply saying your team lacks character. Good luck with that this season. Good teams find a way, above and beyond their talent.
Earlier you suggested that you would rather be a husker than whatever pejorative you used for CU. Fine. That's your choice. However, I just looked up the Zestimate on the address at which you claim to live. Apparently, just based on comparative real estate values, you are in the minority. Seems like far more folks want to live in the CU footprint than where the huskers live.