:lol:
Not even close, not even close. You even dream you have more talent than CU you better wake up and apologize!
K. Glad you don't have an argument so you dodge mine
:lol:
Not even close, not even close. You even dream you have more talent than CU you better wake up and apologize!
K. Glad you don't have an argument so you dodge mine
Even with the loss of those 3 players we still have higher ranked players (6 to CU's 4). With those 3 we would have had 9 to CU's 4 on Phil Steele's.
It must suck having less talent than CSU.
CSU lost to the likes of Utah st, San Jose st, UNLV last year. Very nearly lost to 1 win New Mexico.
CU is not that great, but CSU is horrible and a BCS coach is not going to magically right the ship overnight. Hell he might never right the ship. Colorado had a offensive coordinator leave for Vanderbilt after we won the national title in 1990, and he didn't turn Vandy around. CSU fans need to take a step back into reality.
Gasm, I don't want there to be any more secrets between us.Even with the loss of those 3 players we still have higher ranked players (6 to CU's 4). With those 3 we would have had 9 to CU's 4 on Phil Steele's.
It must suck having less talent than CSU.
Can't step back into reality when you have never been in reality to start with. CSU has been one of the worst BCS teams for a long time. They have never come close to being a contender for a national championship and have rarely even contended for the championship of a second rate conference. Outside of the Lubbick years their conference championships can be counted on the fingers of someone who got their hands caught in agricultural machinery (makes it easy on their fans.)
They continue to pretend that they are a major program as they continue to slide downward where they have spent most of their history.
Savor it... a little over 8 days and it's all over.
And we have spent most of our history ranked in the top 25. Even in our down years, we have still owned those sad rammies.
We have shut them out more often than they have beaten us, says it all.
Even with the loss of those 3 players we still have higher ranked players (6 to CU's 4). With those 3 we would have had 9 to CU's 4 on Phil Steele's.
It must suck having less talent than CSU.
Even with the loss of those 3 players we still have higher ranked players (6 to CU's 4). With those 3 we would have had 9 to CU's 4 on Phil Steele's.
It must suck having less talent than CSU.[/]
Unfortunately you're going to need to suit up more than 6 players next week and the rest of your roster is complete sh!t compared even to a weak CU team.
Hey CSU is still giving tryouts to students to fill a couple need positions, they might find some studs in time for us.:lol:
Can we please not let this become another Marvin Wilson v the state of Texas type threads?
It was a serious question. Still waiting on a legitimate answer from CU fans
you don't understand. Gasm's arbitrary rankings matter more than your arbitrary rankings,:lol:
Here.
http://footballrecruiting.rivals.com/
Go check the recruiting rankings for the last 5 years. CU has more talent across the board than CSU. You may now move on to your next idotic argument.
you don't understand. Gasm's arbitrary rankings matter more than your arbitrary rankings,
Anyone know who Cigarette Lover magazine picks to win the game?
'Gasm seems unwilling to acknowledge reality and facts.
Someday, you will be right :lol:Cu 77
csu 3
This ain't the late 90's or 00's anymore.Game is usually close, why would this year be any different? Especially with so many true freshman playing