Plus, awkward phrasing.Not cool.
Plus, awkward phrasing.Not cool.
That literally was the day Nebraska ceased to matter. Hopefully the same for the Ducks. I'm way tired of that team.I'd actually say that it has more to due with our opponents. OU just suffered one of those program defining losses (62 points sound familiar). ASU and Arizona are definitely vulnerable as well to go along with OSU and WSU. If Colorado can't get one win out of those games then the writing will be pretty thick on the wall at that point.
You're right, editedNot cool.
Ab
abused? That's a nice hyperbole.
The point I'm making is that if your defense is **** and you have nothing at QB you are a vulnerable team. Oregon is exactly that. A healthy team doesn't lose by 42 at home to a good but not great team.
It is funny how an unbiased source considered Sefo a top half PAC 12 QB (#2 going into this week) yet apparently he's so awful. All the while Lockie/Adams are near the bottom.
College football focus is an independent, advanced stats group. Their ratings are based on some pretty high level analysis. For what it's worthCU gave up 220 yards rushing to CSU. What about that stat is hyperbole. As to a source that has Sefo rated highly I can only assume that they did not watch any of the games and just saw a stat line. Just watching games yesterday I would take the QB from the following teams over Sefo. UCLA, USC, Utah, Cal, Stanford, Solomon from UA (Randal is sick as a runner), and I still think Adams and Locke from Oregon are better than Sefo.
At some point people will realize total yards is irrelevant. A 4.4 YPC isn't abusing a defense. 218 on 49 carries. Meh.CU gave up 220 yards rushing to CSU. What about that stat is hyperbole. As to a source that has Sefo rated highly I can only assume that they did not watch any of the games and just saw a stat line. Just watching games yesterday I would take the QB from the following teams over Sefo. UCLA, USC, Utah, Cal, Stanford, Solomon from UA (Randal is sick as a runner), and I still think Adams and Locke from Oregon are better than Sefo.
Better than any Oregon QB by a good amount, which is the stem of this discussion.Where do you rank Sefo in terms of P12 QBs tini?
Better than any Oregon QB by a good amount, which is the stem of this discussion.
Sounds a lot like what you spouted prior to the Hawaii game... see where that got us.Helfrich is not a good coach. Oregon has no QB and their D is extremely vulnerable and really bad. This isn't a Oregon anyone has seen in a long, long time.
Because we've got people here who say he's at the bottom of the barrel, but there's a site that actually knows what is going on when evaluating a player having them near the top. I'd put him in the top 4, but I think Goff is clearly the class of the conference. I'm not avoiding it, just keeping the discussion on the root of the argument, which is he claim that Oregon has far superior QB's.You're vehemently defending a site that has Sefo at #2, yet you're avoiding answering my simple question. If you don't even agree with the website yourself, which is my suspicion, then what are you defending?
Anything I say, or you say, or anyone else says has no bearing on the outcome. And I've been saying Helfrich isn't a good coach and having a MM at QB saved his ass. Good coaches don't get beat by 42 points at home when you're coming off of a national title run. Oregon is not a healthy team right now. No defense and no QB, that makes for a vulnerable team.Sounds a lot like what you spouted prior to the Hawaii game... see where that got us.
So I assume you're paid to evaluate players?
Snow made a thread on it. Go look at it. They release the QB rankings weekly on Twitter for free.
Preseason rankings and in-season rankings are completely different. The in-season rankings are based off of what happened, pre-season is using past statistics to predict trends for the following year. Using one prediction is reaching for straws to try and discredit them.