If you want to figure out how much to expect on a running play, it's relevant. We were explosive, not efficient
How many times does this need to be repeated for people to understand the significance?
If you want to figure out how much to expect on a running play, it's relevant. We were explosive, not efficient
Two more for me.How many times does this need to be repeated for people to understand the significance?
don't repeat. maybe present a distribution graph, calculate mean, median, standard deviation and probabilities of (a) loss (b) gain < 5 yards (c) gain > 5 yards (d) gain > 10 yards for any given run attempt.How many times does this need to be repeated for people to understand the significance?
MM got drunk on the running game the last 7 mins of the ASU game. It spilled over into the game plan for the next three games. That was not a good move. Please replace Adams soon.I agree with the running up the middle mindset, and I am trying to figure out where the hell that came from in the last 3-4 games? When we do not have a lead blocker, or a jumbo package, why the heck do we run it up the middle? Freshman Center, not the best OL overall yet, and our WR's are probably some of the best blockers? When we ran stretch, or other types of edge plays, Travon can pick a hole and push for a decent gain. Standard personnel, with a single back (especially one with no real body lean or power) trying to dive forward for a yard when 9-10 guys are pushing that area makes no sense. Would it be nice to have the OL buck up and get that yard, yes, but it has not and will not happen right now.
Running up the middle seems so....oh I don't know.........Bill Parcells like, MM's favorite coach of all time.
Here what I’d do. H- back stays in to block. Trips run combo routes to prevent over the top coverage. Motion to help Montez wil pre-snap reads. Three step drops. Spray routes like Rams.So, Mr. Playcaller: what is your recommendation when the OL routinely gives up sacks against light boxes and the QB only sees double teams across the board in the secondary?
How many runs for 2, 1, 0 or neg yards?We averaged 6 yards a carry. If you want to cherry pick and take out Travon's 75 yard run, we still averaged over 4 yards a carry. You act like we ran 50 times for negative yardage.
How many runs for 2, 1, 0 or neg yards?
Agree. There are plenty of efficiency stats out there for teams with splits for O and D.don't repeat. maybe present a distribution graph, calculate mean, median, standard deviation and probabilities of (a) loss (b) gain < 5 yards (c) gain > 5 yards (d) gain > 10 yards for any given run attempt.
in seriousness, few complex subjects (and I believe football is one) can be explained with a single number such as the mean value.
How many times does this need to be repeated for people to understand the significance?
Would have to know previous runs for 0 or neg in that particular situation.You tell me. A 1 or 2 yard run would've gotten the first.
You tell me. A 1 or 2 yard run would've gotten the first.
We needed 1 yard.
Game in 60 is up:
https://pac-12.com/videos/2018-football-60-game-week-oregon-state-colorado
We needed closer to 2 than 1.
No motion to help Montez read.
Jmac with a 10 yd + cushion in the slot. RPO to the left. If the contain guy drops, toss / hand to McMillan outside. 1st down. if the contain guy crashes, Jmac takes the slant. 1st down.
Results. Up the middle. 1 yd. Downs.
All of them?How many runs for 2, 1, 0 or neg yards?
Here what I’d do. H- back stays in to block. Trips run combo routes to prevent over the top coverage. Motion to help Montez wil pre-snap reads. Three step drops. Spray routes like Rams.
Yes, I'd like them to run a play that involved the skill players - Montez, McMillan and Jmac to account for the deficiencies - the entire OL - by running AWAY from the front and giving them GASP more than 1 option for when the OL **** all over themselves, again.And when they ****ed all that up, you would've been here whining about that too. Again, they didn't execute well enough to run a simple dive play and pick up a yard plus, but you want them to run an RPO on 4th and 1?
Yes, I'd like them to run a play that involved the skill players - Montez, McMillan and Jmac to account for the deficiencies - the entire OL - by running AWAY from the front and giving them GASP more than 1 option for when the OL **** all over themselves, again.
Go watch the replay, and tell me that going to the left, where Jmac had 10 yds to gain 2 wasn't a better option.
It's not like we don't run that play. We know how. Wonder who chose not to?
You forgot only rushing 4 on 3rd and 9+You can blame the coaches for a terrible job recruiting/developing the OL, as well as an awful defensive coverage/alignment scheme playing 8 yards off most of the 2nd half, but at what point are players held accountable for their ****ty play on the field?
They had 1 sack the entire game. Are you seriously telling me we ran the ball there cause we were afraid to get sacked?And when Montez is sacked on 4th and 1, what would you say?
They had 1 sack the entire game. Are you seriously telling me we ran the ball there cause we were afraid to get sacked?
They did, however have 5 TFL (6 counting the sack) - so by your logic, we should have been passing anyway.
I dont think I've actually listened to a Mac press conference in like 4 years.Coach, when you look back, what could YOU have done differently to stem the momentum?
Well, we practiced, some things, the players, the other coaches . . . . IT WASN'T ME I DIDN'T **** UP
He should run for office. Great job of completely avoiding the question.
Under center snaps are not reliable. As we saw...There's two things I'd like to see us try on short yardage - QB under center sneak, and power run with either a full back or H-back. Not sure where that's gone.
Right??? Because I'm assuming they are never practiced.Under center snaps are not reliable. As we saw...
Looks like Maddox will be starting this game.