Yes really.Not really.
Yes really.Not really.
49 Buffs
41 Cadets
We need to control the edges this week or we are ****ed.
Right, actually a disadvantage in altitudeNor an altitude advantage....
Now that we have a sample size, CSU and NU are arguably not as good as AFA. Definitely not as disciplined. They might be the toughest team on our non-con slate. We're not a great team by any stretch; we're going to lose some games this year. I will not be surprised if we take losses to disciplined teams like AFA. I'm not sure how many people realistically had us 3-0 coming out of next week.Yes really.
Now that we have a sample size, CSU and NU are arguably not as good as AFA. Definitely not as disciplined. They might be the toughest team on our non-con slate. We're not a great team by any stretch; we're going to lose some games this year. I will not be surprised if we take losses to disciplined teams like AFA. I'm not sure how many people realistically had us 3-0 coming out of next week.
Do I think we'll win? Yes. Is it possible that they're a better team and give us a hard game? Ask Michigan.
It's just not a good match for a team that gets sloppy defending the run. I suppose you could look at it from the other side too. AFA was lights out defending the run, but got absolutely, positively scorched by the deep ball through the air last year. We need Montez's A game.Now that we have a sample size, CSU and NU are arguably not as good as AFA. Definitely not as disciplined. They might be the toughest team on our non-con slate. We're not a great team by any stretch; we're going to lose some games this year. I will not be surprised if we take losses to disciplined teams like AFA. I'm not sure how many people realistically had us 3-0 coming out of next week.
Do I think we'll win? Yes. Is it possible that they're a better team and give us a hard game? Ask Michigan.
One of my coworkers played for AFA. He said their biggest weakness has always been defending the pass because their DB’s typically aren’t very good.It's just not a good match for a team that gets sloppy defending the run. I suppose you could look at it from the other side too. AFA was lights out defending the run, but got absolutely, positively scorched by the deep ball through the air last year. We need Montez's A game.
NahA loss to AFA would undo all of the good that we’ve done so far.
Have to check the tape, but I think most people here had us at 3-0 coming out of the OOC. CSU and AFA should never be games that CU fan pick as losses. The Michigan comparison is fine, I guess, because service academy and all, but Army won 11 games last year and many people had them as a borderline top 25 team going into this season. Michigan is also a consistently underperforming team under Harbaugh.Now that we have a sample size, CSU and NU are arguably not as good as AFA. Definitely not as disciplined. They might be the toughest team on our non-con slate. We're not a great team by any stretch; we're going to lose some games this year. I will not be surprised if we take losses to disciplined teams like AFA. I'm not sure how many people realistically had us 3-0 coming out of next week.
Do I think we'll win? Yes. Is it possible that they're a better team and give us a hard game? Ask Michigan.
Have to check the tape, but I think most people here had us at 3-0 coming out of the OOC. CSU and AFA should never be games that CU fan pick as losses. The Michigan comparison is fine, I guess, because service academy and all, but Army won 11 games last year and many people had them as a borderline top 25 team going into this season. Michigan is also a consistently underperforming team under Harbaugh.
Yeah!
Most people here had us at 6 wins or under, but that's not really the point. I just don't think that a loss to AFA is as impactful to the season as a loss to CSU or NU would have been. NU because it means more, and CSU because everyone was predicting they'd be horrible. Point is, 6-6 teams can be be beat by teams that know their identity and are disciplined about how they approach games. I would have made the same comment if we were playing NIU this coming weekend; you **** around, they can easily catch a middling P5 team because you know they are going to bring it all 4 quarters and give zero ****s about talent differential (as the Fuskers are about to find out).Have to check the tape, but I think most people here had us at 3-0 coming out of the OOC. CSU and AFA should never be games that CU fan pick as losses. The Michigan comparison is fine, I guess, because service academy and all, but Army won 11 games last year and many people had them as a borderline top 25 team going into this season. Michigan is also a consistently underperforming team under Harbaugh.
I think you read that poll incorrectly. 80% of posters here had CU with 6 wins or MORE, and there's not way most of those posters figured there'd be 6< wins without starting 3-0. Regardless, I get the point. People are scared of AFA the same way they are scared of CSU every year. Triple Option is a different animal and harder to stop, not because the scheme is so difficult, but rather the team gets about 4 days of real practice to prepare for it in total and responsibilities are different than they are used to.Most people here had us at 6 wins or under, but that's not really the point. I just don't think that a loss to AFA is as impactful to the season as a loss to CSU or NU would have been. NU because it means more, and CSU because everyone was predicting they'd be horrible. Point is, 6-6 teams can be be beat by teams that know their identity and are disciplined about how they approach games. I would have made the same comment if we were playing NIU this coming weekend; you **** around, they can easily catch a middling P5 team because you know they are going to bring it all 4 quarters and give zero ****s about talent differential (as the Fuskers are about to find out).
View attachment 31375
I think CU wins, but I also have a healthy respect for AF. That triple option is no joke, and it can make a P5 team look silly in a hurry. Obviously, the better team speed and overall roster talent SHOULD be able to make up for the offensive scheme the Falcons will employ. Have to take the seriously though, and have to play disciplined football.
I think you read that poll incorrectly. 80% of posters here had CU with 6 wins or MORE, and there's not way most of those posters figured there'd be 6< wins without starting 3-0. Regardless, I get the point. People are scared of AFA the same way they are scared of CSU every year. Triple Option is a different animal and harder to stop, not because the scheme is so difficult, but rather the team gets about 4 days of real practice to prepare for it in total and responsibilities are different than they are used to.
Fortunately, we have a staff that's had to deal with the P5 equivalent of Air Force style offense the last 3 years, so there shouldn't be a ton of "learning" how to stop it from them, but rather focus on teaching the players.
Someone told me the AF game is sold out. Of course 10,000 of those are fusker fans who bought season tix so they could watch there mighty fuskers storm into Folsom to exact revenge. Oops! How’d that work out?
I wonder how many actual season ticket holders sold their tickets to fuskers and how many were purchased through the CU ticket sales?Can we hopefully get those tix back, OR have a walk in ticket offer to fill those seats
The line this morning says Falcons are 3.5 point dogs.
This thread says that’s easy money.
Buffs learn perimeter containment in the second half.
Win 38-28
Tucker honeymoon extended.
Thought I heard one sportsbook had AFA favored by 1? Super easy money!
The initial line was CU by 1.5 but it quickly moved to 3.5 and I think Adam misstated and said Air Force had the -1.5. That’s my guess on where op heard thatYou heard wrong. If there is a bookie hanging that line, I politely request their contact details.
The initial line was CU by 1.5 but it quickly moved to 3.5 and I think Adam misstated and said Air Force had the -1.5. That’s my guess on where op heard that