hawg1
Well-Known Member
Sounds like the officials screwed up in the end of the Cal-Ole Miss game
Or Coach Luke.
Sounds like the officials screwed up in the end of the Cal-Ole Miss game
It would not be that unique in the Pac-12.
What is Stanford?It would not be that unique in the Pac-12.
How does him saying it wouldn’t be unique in the PAC-12 correlate to him saying they wouldn’t dominate? Those are two separate discussionsYou don't think Wisconsin would be even more dominant in the Pac12?? Ok
You don't think Wisconsin would be even more dominant in the Pac12?? Ok
This. They've been .500 against Pac-12 teams this decade. Most of that has been against the Pac's better teams in bowl games, so figure Wisconsin would be 70% or so playing a full conference schedule. So, I'd guess about the same. Also what I figure against the Big 12. They'd be worse against the SEC. Their record would improve if against the ACC.Wisconsin would be as good as they are in the Big 10. I do not think they would be more dominant in the Pac-12.
That's when you know you're good, right there. They know what's coming and you can do it anyway.How can anyone not be a fan of what Wisconsin does? Everyone knows exactly what they’re going to do, and they just line up and dominate the LOS. Went for it on 4th down in their own territory on the first drive with no hesitation. 7-0 Badgers
Stupid, meaningless AP & Coaches polls.How is Wisconsin only ranked 13?
They've got to be one of the 5 best teams in the country.
Klatt had them at #7 in his rankings earlier this week. They should be undefeated when they go to tOSU at the end of October.How is Wisconsin only ranked 13?
They've got to be one of the 5 best teams in the country.
Wisconsin would be as good as they are in the Big 10. I do not think they would be more dominant in the Pac-12.
IMO, the PAC-12 is not a trash conference. If anything, the PAC is the most balanced conference and schools just eat each other alive. Everyone ends up with at least 3 losses. I will acknowledge the losses to SEC schools on big stages but, the PAC has some teams that can play with anyone.This. They've been .500 against Pac-12 teams this decade. Most of that has been against the Pac's better teams in bowl games, so figure Wisconsin would be 70% or so playing a full conference schedule. So, I'd guess about the same. Also what I figure against the Big 12. They'd be worse against the SEC. Their record would improve if against the ACC.
We must not be watching the same Pac12 over the last few years...
Has another school earned more perceived "prestige" without the success to back it up more than Texas A&M?
By watching them. Lewis is not the level of player that is going to be starting as a freshman.Forgive me, but how do you know that?
Another 2H meltdown. Players don’t care.Willie Taggart has got to go.
By watching them. Lewis is not the level of player that is going to be starting as a freshman.
No. Not even close to top 5 in the country. Wait until they play someone.How is Wisconsin only ranked 13?
They've got to be one of the 5 best teams in the country.
Better athletes in the Pac as well. Much more speed than the B1G.Apparently not. A lot of teams in the Pac-12 play physical football.
I don't like Lewis' arm at all. Bachmeier better arm, better feet, quicker throwing motion, a good runner. I like Lewis' potential. IMO, he's got a long way to go.You can seriously tell that from highlight videos?
I don't like Lewis' arm at all. Bachmeier better arm, better feet, quicker throwing motion, a good runner. I like Lewis' potential. IMO, he's got a long way to go.