Sykobuff
Well-Known Member
OL doesn't have to be very good. They just can't be very bad.
They need to be good, enough with this matador pass protection.
OL doesn't have to be very good. They just can't be very bad.
OL doesn't have to be very good. They just can't be very bad.
Doesn't matter how good you are if you can't stay healthy.Maybe we have watched completely different games.....But Adkins has been by far our best back IMO. He just gets hurt too often. Carr has the biggest upside, and Lindsay has fire....but I have no idea where this perception of Adkins is coming from. He was our only competent running back a few years ago ( and I would go beyod that and say he looked really friggin good considering the OLine her was playing behind).
Partial to the "Maryland I" myself!Wishbone time!
I guess that's where we disagree. Following that logic, we shouldn't sign kids that have been hurt (like the talented kid out of LA that we just signed who blew out his knee last year) He's here, he's a Buff. We can't (or won't) just cut him like an NFL team would with a player that has a history of injuries. I am rooting for the kid to get healthy....if he's healthy, he's one of our best backs.But honestly, the "if he can stay healthy" qualifier is a copout. He has proven very little in that regard, so it is fair for people to write him off. It is part of the overall player profile.
FWIW, I do not think the OL will be very good in 2016... and it might not matter if we have some guys with big play ability.
Doesn't matter how good you are if you can't stay healthy.
This isn't a few years ago. We have some talent at the RB position in 2016 but you can't rotate 5 guys, with a couple hybrids (Lee/Julmisse) getting some carries as well. Adkins has done a nice job at times for this team and I hope nothing but the best for him, but he is nowhere close to good enough that CU can't do without him.
That Paul Richardson argument is not true. Stick by your point, but I'm not getting your argument.Paul Richardson couldn't/can't stay healthy. Lee and Juilimiss will play WR. Lee only played RB last year because we had so many injuries. I stick by my point but am going to stop arguing.
I guess that's where we disagree. Following that logic, we shouldn't sign kids that have been hurt (like the talented kid out of LA that we just signed who blew out his knee last year) He's here, he's a Buff. We can't (or won't) just cut him like an NFL team would with a player that has a history of injuries. I am rooting for the kid to get healthy....if he's healthy, he's one of our best backs.
Paul Richardson was a 2nd round NFL draft pick and quite possibly the most explosive player CU has had since....???Adkins isn't in the same league. My point is, we have some potentially dynamic players at the RB position and Adkins has proven over time to be a JAG. The offense can't afford to give an injury-prone, mediocre player reps and keep talented guys like Carr, Bish, Dino and Lindsay on the bench.Paul Richardson couldn't/can't stay healthy. Lee and Juilimiss will play WR. Lee only played RB last year because we had so many injuries. I stick by my point but am going to stop arguing.
PR has 2 ACL's and a ruptured spleen in the last 6 years IIRCThat Paul Richardson argument is not true. Stick by your point, but I'm not getting your argument.
And how is that similar to a guy with no severe injuries but has missed far more games? (Even putting aside Prich was a far better player)PR has 2 ACL's and a ruptured spleen in the last 6 years IIRC
PR was able to redshirt and save eligibility when he blew out his ACL. The issue with Adkins is that he spends all Spring, Summer and Fall getting reps and then misses most of the games with Hamstring pulls or sprained ankles.PR has 2 ACL's and a ruptured spleen in the last 6 years IIRC
The team notices things like that too. And he takes off plenty of the practices to get healthy, so it is even more frustrating I am sure.PR was able to redshirt and save eligibility when he blew out his ACL. The issue with Adkins is that he spends all Spring, Summer and Fall getting reps and then misses most of the games with Hamstring pulls or sprained ankles.
The team notices things like that too. And he takes off plenty of the practices to get healthy, so it is even more frustrating I am sure.
Julmisse has been told he will ply the same role Lee did last year when he gets reps @Bill Cody.
LOL. So true. Personally I'm not drinking the Kool Aid, but with Webb coming in I have a reason to believe 2016 will not be a repeat of 2014 & 15.Back away from the Kool Aid.
First you say you're not drinking it. Then, the next thing you say is that it tastes like cherries.LOL. So true. Personally I'm not drinking the Kool Aid, but with Webb coming in I have a reason to believe 2016 will not be a repeat of 2014 & 15.
LOL. If drinking Kool Aid means I now believe we have a chance to win more than 4 games, then I guess I am...just not very strong Kool Aid.First you say you're not drinking it. Then, the next thing you say is that it tastes like cherries.
There's nothing wrong with that, and anyone who says otherwise can piss off!It's hard not to drink the kool aid. We are all desperate for just a little taste of success after ten years of frustration. We look at the current situation and see an improved defense with Leavitt and a bunch of recruits that on the surface appear to be upgrades over what we have on the roster currently. On offense we see Chiv come in and get Webb, Bish, and some talent at the skill positions. We want to drink the kool aid, so when we have an excuse to do so, we take big gulps.
I have to admit that I didn't follow his injury issues much this year...but the rest of what you're stating seems to be a bit off. He didn't play in a few games of his freshman year because he suffered a concussion. But he played in nine games averaging over 5 yds per carry and was named an honorable mention AA. Sophomore year he played in the first ten games and missed the last 2 games because he had a season ending knee injury....which also kept him out of Spring Football.PR was able to redshirt and save eligibility when he blew out his ACL. The issue with Adkins is that he spends all Spring, Summer and Fall getting reps and then misses most of the games with Hamstring pulls or sprained ankles.
How about last year?I have to admit that I didn't follow his injury issues much this year...but the rest of what you're stating seems to be a bit off. He didn't play in a few games of his freshman year because he suffered a concussion as a true freshman. Played in nine games averaging over 5 yes per carry and was named an honorable mention. Sophomore year he played in the first ten games and missed the last 2 games because he had a season ending knee injury....which also kept him out of Spring Football.
Not sure I follow what point you are trying to make here?I have to admit that I didn't follow his injury issues much this year...but the rest of what you're stating seems to be a bit off. He didn't play in a few games of his freshman year because he suffered a concussion as a true freshman. Played in nine games averaging over 5 yes per carry and was named an honorable mention. Sophomore year he played in the first ten games and missed the last 2 games because he had a season ending knee injury....which also kept him out of Spring Football.
My only point...and one that I am not going to defend because I don't have the energy and time will tell if I'm right or wrong...is that I wouldn't be so quick to write off Adkins as many on here have been doing. I said he's been the most impressive runner when healthy. The retort was that you have to take his injury history into account. I stated that we've had other talented players that have been stars here with a significant injury history...using PRich as an example.....the retort to that then became that he's not nearly as talented as PRich (never my claim) along with the implication that Adkins has a history of milking insignificant injuries.Not sure I follow what point you are trying to make here?
Paul Richardson was a 2nd round NFL draft pick and quite possibly the most explosive player CU has had since Jeremy Bloom.
No nerve has been touched, I just happen to disagree with you. We have a log jam at RB and rotating 5 guys hinders the offense more than helps it. I just don't see anything unique, dynamic, special, etc with Adkins, but he is going to take practice and game reps away from other guys that do have dynamic potential, IMO.My only point...and one that I am not going to defend because I don't have the energy and time will tell if I'm right or wrong...is that I wouldn't be so quick to write off Adkins as many on here have been doing. I said he's been the most impressive runner when healthy. The retort was that you have to take his injury history into account. I stated that we've had other talented players that have been stars here with a significant injury history...using PRich as an example.....the retort to that then became that he's not nearly as talented as PRich (never my claim) along with the implication that Adkins has a history of milking insignificant injuries.
Lindsay is tougher, no doubt. Carr is faster, no doubt. But all in all, Adkins has been the most impressive running back we've had *when healthy* over the last few years....averaging about 5 ypc and making good runs when there was often nothing good in front of him. I wouldn't be so quick to write him off....that was my only point. But apparently I touched a nerve.
Partial to the "Maryland I" myself!