Today's Big Ten TV deal assures it. Things are going to get crazy next summer.
so do we call Texas and Oklahoma first or do we let them come to us
Rather get in now, work it to the Pac's advantage and be selective.
Come on, just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean you fail to see it.I fail to see how anything the Big 10 does forces the PAC 12's hand.
If you fail to see it, then you are blind.I fail to see how anything the Big 10 does forces the PAC 12's hand.
I fail to see how anything the Big 10 does forces the PAC 12's hand.
I follow conference realignment news closely and I'm not seeing it either.I fail to see how anything the Big 10 does forces the PAC 12's hand.
**** you and UTerus.Just don't dilute with the unnecessary schools. Really there is no need for any more schools out west. Focus on a new time zone if you have to expand. Pull in Texas if you can, but only if they are equal partners with the rest.
Really there is no compelling reason for the PAC to expand unless it is into new time zones. The PAC already has the entire western US locked up.
Well the biggest thing for the Pac is getting a deal with DTV done without giving up an equity stake and fixing the solvency issues of the Pac-12 network. That will show the total amount we are behind the Big-10 and then they would have to move from there. Any expansion without a team from Texas is completely worthless. I am not saying this has to be UT but there are 4 huge markets in Texas that need to be added in order to make financial sense.I follow conference realignment news closely and I'm not seeing it either.
I think realignment will continue (it hasn't stopped for more than a five years since the 1950's), but I'm not seeing how the B1G's recent TV deal is necessitating near term changes in the PAC or ACC (these are the three conferences that I follow most closely).
Allbuffs seems to be taking a different perspective than what I'm reading elsewhere, which doesn't mean AB is wrong.
As much as I hate UT, adding other schools just doesn't really move the needle.OU, OSU, Kansas, UT are the only things worth having from the B12.
Houston, UT, OU and KU would be amazing but I would assume KU would be on the Big-10's radar.As much as I hate UT, adding other schools just doesn't really move the needle.
There is zero chance that any Pac 12 expansion would end up being 4 G5 programs that add little to no financial upside. I could see Boise and a tiny sliver of hope for UNLV, given its location, but no shot for NM or SDSU.Maybe I'm saying this because dealing with KU hoops fan on an annual basis again would suck, but I agree KU to the Big10 would make the most sense.
Adding more schools out west wouldn't move the needle much, and there are only 4 schools you could really consider anyway: New Mexico, Boise St., UNLV, and SDSU, and only because of they're tv markets which isn't a lot. I'd much prefer this option over being in a conference with Texas again, but the Pac-12's wallet would prefer Texas.