CVilleBuff
Well-Known Member
I'd almost rather get the 5 seed if we're not going to win the regular season so we can play ASU in the opener for the extra win.
We'd get USC in the opener as the 5 seed, no?
I'd almost rather get the 5 seed if we're not going to win the regular season so we can play ASU in the opener for the extra win.
We'd get USC in the opener as the 5 seed, no?
Wouldn't it be Utah?
OSU up 34-32 @ Cal at the half.
Just in case anyone's interested. :huh:
TEAM | CONF | OVERALL |
California | 12-3 | 22-6 |
Washington | 12-3 | 19-8 |
Colorado | 10-4 | 18-8 |
Arizona | 10-5 | 19-9 |
Oregon | 9-5 | 18-8 |
Stanford | 8-6 | 18-8 |
UCLA | 8-6 | 15-12 |
Washington State | 6-9 | 14-13 |
Oregon State | 5-10 | 15-12 |
Arizona State | 4-11 | 8-19 |
Utah | 2-12 | 5-21 |
USC | 1-13 | 6-21 |
Oh, I think I see what you mean. That they'll get a bid if they win out. I was thinking that they would have an automatic bid if they win out, which might be the only way any Pac-12 should feel safe these days...
Not sure whats up with pac 12 offenses this weekend but Stanford leads Oregon 17-12 with 7:29 left in the half. Oregon shooting 29%
Stanford is falling off.
Pac-12 Standings
TEAM CONF OVERALL California 12-3 22-6 Washington 12-3 19-8 Colorado 10-4 18-8 Arizona 10-5 19-9 Oregon 9-5 18-8 Stanford 8-6 18-8 UCLA 8-6 15-12 Washington State 6-9 14-13 Oregon State 5-10 15-12 Arizona State 4-11 8-19 Utah 2-12 5-21 USC 1-13 6-21
Late February, and we're alone in 3rd just one game out of first place. Take a second and enjoy it.
Btw, sidenote: Brennan isn't even the most clueless. That honor falls to Jason King with his "King's Court". Don't even get me started on that douchebag.
For the most part, Brennan doesn't bother me. He bashes the PAC-12 a lot, but, well, we deserve it. Seriously. As for King? I can't believe you even read his stuff. You're a better man than I.
We win out, we are 14-4
Cal wins except for here they are 14-4
UW wins all except at UCLA they are 14-4
I Know we have the head to head vs UW, but IDK how it works agaisnt Cal
I think that it's head-to-head record against the next highest team in the conference -- which will either be Oregon or Arizona.
I think that it's head-to-head record against the next highest team in the conference -- which will either be Oregon or Arizona.
I think that it's head-to-head record against the next highest team in the conference -- which will either be Oregon or Arizona.
Wouldn't it be udub?
We win out, we are 14-4
Cal wins except for here they are 14-4
UW wins all except at UCLA they are 14-4
I Know we have the head to head vs UW, but IDK how it works agaisnt Cal
WSU could knock UW out of contention tonight for us. Buff fans should be cougar fans. Also Utah could in theory knock off Cal for us as well, giving us a clear path to the title. (Utah will eventually win with how they are playing of late, if they were playing like this, at the beginning they could have become a serious threat as they progressed, it will be interesting to see them next year.)
That one's on Saturday.
Regarding tiebreakers, the Pac-12 names co-champions if there is a tie. The tie breaker rules would be used for P12T seeding purposes.
Here were the rules on tie breakers used in the Pac-10 last year (I assume they're the same):
PAC-10 TOURNAMENT STRUCTURE-SEEDING AND TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURES
Seeding: The seedings and pairings shall be determined upon completion of regular season play on Saturday, March 5. The won-lost percent- age record of the teams in regular season Conference play will determine tournament seedings. The team with the best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #1, the next best won-lost percentage in Conference play will be seeded #2, and so forth through all the seeds.
Tie-Breakers: Tie breaking procedures for determining all tournament seeding will be:
1. Two-team tie
a. Results of head-to-head competition during the regular season.
b. Each team’s record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the ␣nal regular standings, and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents. d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
2. Multiple-team tie
a. Results of collective head-to-head competition during the regular season among the tied teams.
b. If more than two teams are still tied, each of the tied team’s record vs. the team occupying the highest position in the final regular season standings, and then continuing down through the standings until one team gains an advantage.
When arriving at another group of tied teams while comparing records, use each team’s record against the collective tied teams as a group (prior to that group’s own tie-breaking procedure), rather than the performance against individual tied teams.
If at any point the multiple-team tie is reduced to two teams, the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied.
c. Won-lost percentage against all Division I opponents.
d. Coin toss conducted by the Commissioner or designee.
Here's a quick look:
Washington: 0-1 vs CU, 0-1 vs Cal
Cal: 1-1 vs CU (assuming we win Sunday), 1-0 vs UDub
CU: 1-0 vs UDub, 1-1 vs Cal
A 2-way with Washington gives us the #1 seed.
A 3-way tie with Cal and Washington would eliminate Washington. It would then likely go to how CU and Cal did against Oregon (4th place team). Cal's 2-0 against them and we're currently 1-0 with a road trip left. Assuming that ties, we move to 5th place Arizona. We split with Zona and Cal's 0-1, so we'd win the tiebreaker and get the #1 seed.
A 2-way tie with Cal gives us the #1 seed for the same reason the 3-way tie did.
If we win these last 4, we're in very good shape.
(I'm going to re-post the tiebreaker scenarios as a new thread.)