Not first offense.If it is indeed the case that the coaching staff found it necessary to suspend players from 8 conference games for a first-time marijuana offense, they are going far off the deep end. This is 2011, not the 1950s.
Not first offense.
Not sure how true that is for all of them. Just assume there is a lot we don't know.Fair enough. If it is an ongoing problem, then disciplinary action is reasonable.
If it is indeed the case that the coaching staff found it necessary to suspend players from 8 conference games for a first-time marijuana offense, they are going far off the deep end. This is 2011, not the 1950s.
BuffChipsRadio seemed to intimate that it was something other than weed last night.
Hemp then?BuffChipsRadio seemed to intimate that it was something other than weed last night.
insinuate?
If it is indeed the case that the coaching staff found it necessary to suspend players from 8 conference games for a first-time marijuana offense, they are going far off the deep end. This is 2011, not the 1950s.
Spoken like someone with a ton of well behaved kids :lol:Don't care what year it is. if the penalty for breaking any rule is suspension and you break that rule it should get you suspended. first offense or not, weed or not.
stupid kids.
If they do that, they only win by 24 or so.I think Stanford should show some class and state that they will not throw the ball, or at least designate only one eligible receiver on any given play.
I think Stanford should show some class and state that they will not throw the ball, or at least designate only one eligible receiver on any given play.
We'll see. Harbaugh ran it up on USC a few years ago, but there were other dynamics in play. Anyway, it doesn't matter. I'm not convinced we need a defensive secondary to beat Stanford.
intimate = Verb:Imply or hint.
"We are disappointed that these student-athletes have not lived up to the high expectations we have here at the University of Colorado. While not going into specifics, there are not issues with law enforcement, but they have not met their obligations and responsibilities to be active members of the team."
I like it. Let's stick 11 guys in the box and rush every down!!!! It's either TD or Luck goes down!!!
I know Moten was suspended last year because of academics, he was on the field against WAST, now he is suspended. One an assume Moten suspension has more to do with academics.
Moten wasn't suspended because of academics last year. You should just stick to talking about recruiting, that's clearly where all your expertise lies. :lol: And since I know you're not the sharpest tool in the shed, i'll just point out that that was sarcasm.
If it is indeed the case that the coaching staff found it necessary to suspend players from 8 conference games for a first-time marijuana offense, they are going far off the deep end. This is 2011, not the 1950s.