Menu
What's new
By:
Filters
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Pick your top candidates for DC!

Choose your favorite of top 4 candidates (according to Rivals)

  • Gibbs

    Votes: 19 17.0%

  • Pendergast

    Votes: 61 54.5%

  • Orlando

    Votes: 13 11.6%

  • Seto

    Votes: 19 17.0%
  • Total voters
    112
90sBuff said:
I'm really impatient. I want to know now who our DC will be.

So how long do you all think this takes???

Did HCMM already have his guy in mind?? Or is the process just starting now??
Click to expand...
The process has been in place. Pretty sure we hear sooner rather than later. Being reported on other sites so will leave it at that.
 
'Tini said:
No one is saying that is the case here, all people are saying is he will provide the financial backing to make a top notch hire
Click to expand...

Sorry Tini but several have said exactly that including 90sBuff on his long post on this page.
 
Thats what I mean too. But I do think it's a decision that RG plays a big role in because his own goals require a competitive team. He is HCMMs boss. I'm sure HCMM can pick his guy but it also involves RG too. I don't see how that is bad. They should be working together and on the same page.

Shldr2Shldr said:
Certainly do not want RG picking the DC. Want RG to be an advisor and a financial backer to HCMM's decision though.
Click to expand...
 
90sBuff said:
Thats what I mean too. But I do think it's a decision that RG plays a big role in because his own goals require a competitive team. He is HCMMs boss. I'm sure HCMM can pick his guy but it also involves RG too. I don't see how that is bad. They should be working together and on the same page.
Click to expand...

A meddlesome AD can cause unrest on the coaching staff (see wisconsin)

Helpful is good
Micromanaging is not.
 
I didn't think of that. Good point.

but on that note, how would all feel if RG had been the one to force HCMM to make a change at DC? We will never know. But I'm glad we are getting the change either way.

Shldr2Shldr said:
A meddlesome AD can cause unrest on the coaching staff (see wisconsin)

Helpful is good
Micromanaging is not.
Click to expand...
 
I heard from a reliable source that if we lost any of the first four games next year, Baer would have been fired mid season. HCMM was the one who advised them to move on for the better. It allows klayton to move up to a coordinator and Baer to have a longer stay then he would have at CU. RG is there to sell the school and support anything Mac does. MM has more coaching connections then the past three staffs combined.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Are re you saying Klayton becomes DC?

FLounder said:
I heard from a reliable source that if we lost any of the first four games next year, Baer would have been fired mid season. HCMM was the one who advised them to move on for the better. It allows klayton to move up to a coordinator and Baer to have a longer stay then he would have at CU. RG is there to sell the school and support anything Mac does. MM has more coaching connections then the past three staffs combined.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
 
SINKRATZ said:
Put me in the "not keen" category.
Click to expand...
I'm rather done with bringing in old CU guys to serve prominent positions just because they were CU guys. I think it's a plus if all things are equal, but that's it. with Hagan versus who else we could hire, all things are NOT equal. Nor are they for McChesney, to think of it.
 
My choice is a guy none of you have ever heard of. As a matter of fact, I've never heard of him either.
 
ElCunado said:
Nope. Wouldn't name names.
Click to expand...
Well Adam said we should probably know by New Year's if not by the end of this week so the suspense will only kill us for a few more days. Reading between the lines, my guess is they are already in negotiations for a pretty big fish. Perhaps it is far from a sure thing though, and maybe RG is trying to secure the funding? Pins and needles!
 
Darth Snow said:
I'm rather done with bringing in old CU guys to serve prominent positions just because they were CU guys. I think it's a plus if all things are equal, but that's it. with Hagan versus who else we could hire, all things are NOT equal. Nor are they for McChesney, to think of it.
Click to expand...
Absolutely this. Hire the best guys we can find, regardless of ties to the program. Didn't work for us nor Michigan...
 
boydbuff said:
Well Adam said we should probably know by New Year's if not by the end of this week so the suspense will only kill us for a few more days. Reading between the lines, my guess is they are already in negotiations for a pretty big fish. Perhaps it is far from a sure thing though, and maybe RG is trying to secure the funding? Pins and needles!
Click to expand...

Got the same feeling. Patr has been right on lately.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top