Nwoke isn't a pussy, he won't get injured
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
Predictions for RMS
- Thread starter OMFGasm
- Start date
Nwoke isn't a pussy, he won't get injured
:lol: I look forward to bumping this
JJBuff
Club Member
Tea Rex
Club Member
Their season was over when Lubick "retired"
I went to StubHub to see if I could off my tickets and how much I could get -
Pretty interesting layout of selling. No one is trying to sell on the CSU side, probably cause you can easily get your tix from the ticket office there.
CU side is a different story
http://www.stubhub.com/colorado-sta.../colorado-state-vs-colorado-9-1-2012-4048391/
Pretty interesting layout of selling. No one is trying to sell on the CSU side, probably cause you can easily get your tix from the ticket office there.
CU side is a different story
http://www.stubhub.com/colorado-sta.../colorado-state-vs-colorado-9-1-2012-4048391/
NashBuff
CSU Knob-Slobberer
http://www.mwcboard.com/www/forums/index.php?showtopic=41698
Looks like CSU is thin at RB and will that mean CSU will need to pass the ball more often? Like I said on that thread, the Ram QBs better get extra padding in their helmets & shoulder pads since that OL was terrible last spring.
http://blogs.denverp...crimmage/23582/
You read that right...27 sacks given up in one scrimmage last spring for the Rams. Coach had it at 32 sacks.
Looks like CSU is thin at RB and will that mean CSU will need to pass the ball more often? Like I said on that thread, the Ram QBs better get extra padding in their helmets & shoulder pads since that OL was terrible last spring.
http://blogs.denverp...crimmage/23582/
You read that right...27 sacks given up in one scrimmage last spring for the Rams. Coach had it at 32 sacks.
Obviously you haven't heard of Chuck Fairbanks and the nasty blue he made us wear. You know i typically enjoy posters from other schools. We even have some CSU fans that post here regularly. You though piss me off every time i read your bull ****. I cannot wait for CU to pummel you guys... Can't wait.
Hey Gasm, hows your gf? Oops asking the wrong guy, sorry.
SINKRATZ
PhD in Analogy
GASM help me with something, CSU has gone 3-9 for three straight seasons, ****** right? CU is allegedly going to lose, in large part, because CSU has experience all over the field, but at the same time CSU had a ton of guys miss most of the season with injuries last year.
So tell me: how experienced can CSU be if your best guys have all missed most of the season with injury? Given your record the last 3 years against an embarrassingly weak schedule, it seems you have basically a team full of terrible, injury-prone players. It doesn't seem like your regular starters or you backups are capable of winning games so how can you be so confident going into a season with a team full of experienced losers?
So tell me: how experienced can CSU be if your best guys have all missed most of the season with injury? Given your record the last 3 years against an embarrassingly weak schedule, it seems you have basically a team full of terrible, injury-prone players. It doesn't seem like your regular starters or you backups are capable of winning games so how can you be so confident going into a season with a team full of experienced losers?
COTransplant
Club Member
Just wow. I know logic isn't your forte, but man. This is terrible.
Lets use a syllogism to break this down like so:
Major Premise: All things in Group A are also in Group B
Minor Premise: All things in Group B are also in Group C
Conclusion: All things in Group A are also in Group C
Syllogism according to 'Gasm:
Major Premise: Only pussies get injured
Minor Premise: CSU lost the 5th most starts in Division I last year due to injuries. (Also, nice spelling of 'lost'. you sure you can read?)
Conclusion: Rather than "CSU's team is a bunch of pussies" like it should be, it's 'We're gonna win 6 or 7 games this year'
But what do I know. I may or not be able to read.
Lets use a syllogism to break this down like so:
Major Premise: All things in Group A are also in Group B
Minor Premise: All things in Group B are also in Group C
Conclusion: All things in Group A are also in Group C
Syllogism according to 'Gasm:
Major Premise: Only pussies get injured
Minor Premise: CSU lost the 5th most starts in Division I last year due to injuries. (Also, nice spelling of 'lost'. you sure you can read?)
Conclusion: Rather than "CSU's team is a bunch of pussies" like it should be, it's 'We're gonna win 6 or 7 games this year'
But what do I know. I may or not be able to read.
Great post. I suspect we won't be seeing Gasm reply to your logic.
Philosophy major? :lol: awesome post though. Rep when I get home.
End thread.
that team had a pretty dang good d that year though. i would not mind having that D this year.
anyway....
That D was goddamn solid, especially given the limitations they dealt with on offense.
CsquaredCC
Well-Known Member
The formula for this game has gotten pretty easy to predict in recent history. Basically, which ever team (a) controls the line of scrimmage, (b) runs effectively, and (c) hits a few play action plays - will win the game. If you go back and look at the rushing statistics for this game they tell the story. Since 2008 the losing team in this game has been outrushed (as a team) by an approximate 2-1 margin. In fact, no team has passed for more than 300 yards since the 2003 game. This years version of the RMS looks very similar to me. Whoever wins the ground game will likely win the game. IMO.
Last edited:
It must hurt having Gasm represent the rams on this board. SOlid post.
Spot on analysis. This game is won in the trenches.
CsquaredCC
Well-Known Member
No question about it. In 2009 CSU was very effective in the trenches. In 2011, CU's fourth quarter was a clinic on how you ground and pound your way to a victory. It's sort of what this game has become in recent memory.
That's impossible. We had 5'6 Rodney Stewart out there
And this makes sense with the lack of real game changers at the skill positions for both teams over the years - especially QB.
Deleted member 807
Guest
Worse than 2006? BJax is flattered.
Yup. I think it is because neither team has really had the talent on the outside. Although we were talented at WR last year, our receiver corp was really meh early on outside of Richardson (at least, until Clemons came on).