So, in their next scrimmage (summer, of course), does that mean their amazing defense will only get 20 sacks?
Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I'm still thinking 22 sacks, and rushing of -50, so some major improvement by the offense.
So, in their next scrimmage (summer, of course), does that mean their amazing defense will only get 20 sacks?
All I know is while I have total faith in our staff to do their job in this game, they better not pull a Barnett/Halk CSU game plan.
Mtn, I don't think CU has been successful enough to develop that kind of hubris. I see a very young and hungry Buff team taking the field. Their inexperience will be exposed when they are outmanned next season, but the lambs won't be one of the teams to out man them.
I hope you are right but we have had years in the past when CSU came in entirely focused and CU didn't, the results weren't what we wanted to see.
As bad a CSU is going to be CU cannot just show up and count on winning. They will get CSU's game of the year and it is possible for CU to let themselves get beat if they aren't ready.
My biggest fear is that the Buffs read all the press leading up and completely overlook CSU at the same time as CSU plays the game of their lives. CSU knows that they are going to suck this year. They have no hope of winning their conference and realistically don't even dream of winning enough to get a bad bowl game
All I know is while I have total faith in our staff to do their job in this game, they better not pull a Barnett/Halk CSU game plan.
Mainly Barnett, as much as it pains me to say this, CSU is the only team that we played every year that Halk had a winning record over. 2009 in Boulder is really the only shocking loss we took under Hawkins. The '06 game was not that big of a deal seeing how we just lost to Montana state.
This. The beat-down to open the season in 2000 or 1999, where CSU was up by like three touchdowns at the half to a significantly better CU team... no excuses for that ****. I think CU went on to crush BC in a bowl game that year.
Then we went on to lose to CSU 41-14 the next year I believe. Most infuriating part of the Barnett era was those damn CSU games.
I predict several more unfortunate and braindead injuries for the football team and their fans before kickoff. Another one just happened today:
http://www.9news.com/news/local/art...dent-tries-to-jump-into-pool-from-roof-misses
horrible. i take no pleasure in that.
agreed. WTF is wrong with some people.
I predict several more unfortunate and braindead injuries for the football team and their fans before kickoff. Another one just happened today:
http://www.9news.com/news/local/art...dent-tries-to-jump-into-pool-from-roof-misses
happens at all schools. well, all ages anywhere to be frank. people get lubed up on the booze and want to be the life of the party and do something stupid. most times its harmless. other times, you get this. its just darwin at work.
100% of what presents itself in an emergency room is, in one way or another, sperm related.
Vegetarian Vagina.reminds me.... one time i should have been stupid. at a bar in vero beach, fl with all my fly school buddies. they had 150 bucks on the table for me to jump in the pool that not one single person was in, in my clothes.
no danger involved. we were on the deck. all i had to do was just take a small leap into the pool and collect 150 dollars.
i declined.
that was like half a weeks pay right there. :lol: stupid booze makes you do stupid ****. although, i was never much of a showman. :smile2:
One thing he was asked is why we
should support this when we play what will soon become essentially a
D2 schedule. His answer was essentially, in the Pac12 there is
Washington & Washington State, Oregon & Oregon State, Arizona &
Arizona State, Colorado and ??? Then he basically said that Utah was
in the same place we were a few years ago and if we invest in this
stadium we will have the ability to make that jump. Our academics is
as good or better then most of the PAC12 so we would be able to
recruit with the best of them
My thoughts exactly.The lambies need to understand that Larry Scott is their worst enemy for expansion into the Pac 12. They are a huge negative investment monetarily from a media contract perspective. No invites for them.
Edit: The grammar displayed in the statement about academics is pretty funny.
The lambies need to understand that Larry Scott is their worst enemy for expansion into the Pac 12. They are a huge negative investment monetarily from a media contract perspective. No invites for them.
Edit: The grammar displayed in the statement about academics is pretty funny.
My thoughts exactly.
So I read the whole post. What I am still trying to figure out is their overall strategy to get a BCS invite that they seem to view as a slam dunk.
Every single one of their senior management types in their AD has little to no experience outside of CSU, let alone at BCS schools. Their AD is learning on the job. Their president had a brief stint as a professor at Oregon State over two decades ago, otherwise his resume is all CSU. Then you have their coaching staff. Yes, McElwain has his experience from Bama and a few others have limited BCS experience, but most of the staff has limited 1-A experience, let alone BCS experience. This is the group that is supposed to lead them to the promised land? The credibility with potential peers in a new conference is severely lacking.