Born a Terps fan, safe to say there's no team I dislike more in college basketball than Dook!It would be a huge win for the PAC. I'm torn on who to root for between Duke and UCLA. I really dislike coach K and his constant whining but at the same time I want Zona's win over them to hold merit. What do you guys think?
It would be a huge win for the PAC. I'm torn on who to root for between Duke and UCLA. I really dislike coach K and his constant whining but at the same time I want Zona's win over them to hold merit. What do you guys think?
Clearly you go for UCLA. And I'm not a "win one for the Pac guy" typically.
We also have to root for Stanford to win at home against UConn this week. They also go to Michigan (better hope for a dead crowd in that one).
Hope might not be enough for them in those two games
We also have to root for Stanford to win at home against UConn this week. They also go to Michigan (better hope for a dead crowd in that one).
Stanford's playing at UConn (in Hartford), and the Michigan game is neutral-site in Brooklyn...
Hope just died a little bit.
Ya you guys are right. Can't wait until PAC-12 season so I can start hating everyone again.
I'd like to know how many teams have 3 wins over top 30 RPI teams. UCSB probably will eventually drop out of the top 25 RPI but that's a quality win right now. 2 opportunities against top 10 RPI teams on neutral/home court in the next 3 weeks. Gotta like Buffs chances of sniffing top 10 AP/Coaches rankings by Jan. 6. At very least, should maintain top 15 RPI going into February.
Slow down. If we lose to Oklahoma state we probably drop out of the top 25.
Slow down. If we lose to Oklahoma state we probably drop out of the top 25.
And a win at home against Oregon would likely vault them back in. Buffs will probably be favored in that game. Not getting that far ahead here. Just looking at the next 4 games and saying I like our chances of ascending to new territory. Excuse my optimism. Not for everyone.
CU checked in at #23 in ESPN's (debut) BPI.
FFS.
QBR and now BPI? I don't think ESPN understands how the advanced metrics community works. ESPN seems to think that if they make up a new metric, and provide a vague description of how the metric works while still retaining the secret sauce behind a curtain that the community will just fall in line and accept the metric.
FFS.
QBR and now BPI? I don't think ESPN understands how the advanced metrics community works. ESPN seems to think that if they make up a new metric, and provide a vague description of how the metric works while still retaining the secret sauce behind a curtain that the community will just fall in line and accept the metric.
The thing that annoys the hell out of me is that when ESPN starts doing all of its bubble talk a month from now, they'll refer to BPI more than they will RPI. Doesn't matter that the Selection Committee uses RPI. All that matters is what ESPN's proprietary metric says. Funny thing is, by the time we get to Selection Sunday there isn't much difference between the two.
Yep, QBR is silly, though they now have the recently appointed messiah of advanced metrics, Nate Silver, on pay roll for their SPI (Soccer Power index) Ha!
Now wait a minute, I actually like that one because it says that the USMNT actually has a shot this summer. :nod:
Back on topic, however: i've been going to realtimerpi to look at the daily rankings; is that pretty much the best site out there? It gives a good daily national, conference and team breakdown (and is free).
Only moved down one spot back to #21 after the loss in the AP.