SJSU or CSU level recruit. In general, we cannot win with these types of recruits regardless of the coach. From what I have seen so far, our recruiting so far is actually WORSE under the new staff than under the old staff. Solid.
SJSU or CSU level recruit. In general, we cannot win with these types of recruits regardless of the coach. From what I have seen so far, our recruiting so far is actually WORSE under the new staff than under the old staff.
SJSU or CSU level recruit. In general, we cannot win with these types of recruits regardless of the coach. From what I have seen so far, our recruiting so far is actually WORSE under the new staff than under the old staff.
SJSU or CSU level recruit. In general, we cannot win with these types of recruits regardless of the coach. From what I have seen so far, our recruiting so far is actually WORSE under the new staff than under the old staff.
I pretty much agree with this.
Remind me how many other PAC 12 offers this kid had. How about ZERO. Why change coaches and then recruit kids from California that no other PAC 12 program wants? The fact is that other schools in the PAC 12 were not impressed enough to offer him.
We'll see if we win with the next batch of no name recruits that no one else in a BCS conference wants. It has not worked for the last 10 years, but I am sure it will now.
Remind me how many other PAC 12 offers this kid had. How about ZERO. Why change coaches and then recruit kids from California that no other PAC 12 program wants? The fact is that other schools in the PAC 12 were not impressed enough to offer him.
We'll see if we win with the next batch of no name recruits that no one else in a BCS conference wants. It has not worked for the last 10 years, but I am sure it will now.
Remind me how many other PAC 12 offers this kid had. How about ZERO. Why change coaches and then recruit kids from California that no other PAC 12 program wants? The fact is that other schools in the PAC 12 were not impressed enough to offer him.
We'll see if we win with the next batch of no name recruits that no one else in a BCS conference wants. It has not worked for the last 10 years, but I am sure it will now.
Remind me how many other PAC 12 offers this kid had. How about ZERO. Why change coaches and then recruit kids from California that no other PAC 12 program wants? The fact is that other schools in the PAC 12 were not impressed enough to offer him.
We'll see if we win with the next batch of no name recruits that no one else in a BCS conference wants. It has not worked for the last 10 years, but I am sure it will now.
SJSU or CSU level recruit. In general, we cannot win with these types of recruits regardless of the coach. From what I have seen so far, our recruiting so far is actually WORSE under the new staff than under the old staff.
Mac will do well in the recruiting wars. It's early in his tenure. Give it some time. He may even make big inroads with JUCOs finally coming to CU...who knows? A lot remains to be played out still.
The bear thinks Macintyre will fare well at CU and turn out better than many of you believe.
His first recruiting class at CU is, essentially, Embree's last.
we are now going to "analyze" every single recruit?????
DC is reporting the kid is gonna play LB here and that he was going to USC, but they didn't have scholly for him and asked him to walk on. It's Ringo info, so take it how you want it.