They are obviously trying to legislate damaging hits out....to what effect, we will see. But IMO, allowing for the use of cannabanoids would be a start.I just don't know what they are gonna be able to do to minimize it really. Hope they know.
And it's not just concussions causing CTE.I'm telling y'all it's not just helmet to helmet causing concussions.
I'm telling y'all it's not just helmet to helmet causing concussions.
Really, what else does? I'm actually asking because Idk.And it's not just concussions causing CTE.
RIP Drew. This really sucks.
Really, what else does? I'm actually asking because Idk.
I see, thanks for that. The little adds up to alot.CTE has been found in the autopsies of people who did not have concussions, but who were exposed to regular blows to the head. The theory is that a lineman taking hundreds of small hits every game is as much at risk as someone who suffers severe concussions.
They are obviously trying to legislate damaging hits out....to what effect, we will see. But IMO, allowing for the use of cannabanoids would be a start.
In 10 years, there may be an effective treatment. Never doubt science and its ability to make breakthroughs.In 10 years it will all be flag football
Many will not understand this, but I am telling you, I really think Cannabanoids might be the answer. I don't smoke weed, never have, but I have personally seen it do some amazing things in this area. Quite ironic actually...In 10 years, there may be an effective treatment. Never doubt science and its ability to make breakthroughs.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...or-a-concussion-pill-as-new-nfl-season-begins
http://news.miami.edu/stories/2016/10/could-a-pill-treat-concussions.html
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/12/cannabinoid-concussion-pill/511508/
Not only does this kind of research have major implications for the future of contact sports (including soccer), it could have major benefits to furthering research in neurodegenerative diseases like dementia and alzheimer's. I also have a feeling that more money will be put into R&D on engineering solutions for safer, more effective headgear. We all know that brain injury occurs from the brain hitting the inner wall of the skull. So the headgear of the future will be able to sense the force of the impact and adjust the damping ratio to allow the head to decelerate at a rate that allows the cranial fluid to protect the brain.
BoxingDo we see as many issues with athletes in other heavy contact sports without helmets? I'm thinking rugby specifically.
The theory would be that wearing a helmet enables a player to be more risky and aggressive with the head. Lose the helmet and they'd all be more careful. No idea if that holds water.
It'd be interesting to see stats from rugby and Aussie football.Do we see as many issues with athletes in other heavy contact sports without helmets? I'm thinking rugby specifically.
The theory would be that wearing a helmet enables a player to be more risky and aggressive with the head. Lose the helmet and they'd all be more careful. No idea if that holds water.
Found this in a Brain Injury Law Center blog:Do we see as many issues with athletes in other heavy contact sports without helmets? I'm thinking rugby specifically.
The theory would be that wearing a helmet enables a player to be more risky and aggressive with the head. Lose the helmet and they'd all be more careful. No idea if that holds water.
Drew's death shall not be in vain.
Drew and Rashaan are two very real and special examples of why fans should be on board with minimizing concussion risk.