What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

Rumors of Certain Regents Potentially Voting Against MT Contract

That should cover it
Hey, you gotta start somewhere.

If I can ever write bigger checks than that to support the CU AD, I will!

Seriously folks, if you give anything at all to the AD, your donation would probably have a bigger impact if it was targeted towards (or against) the regents' political campaigns. Especially the district regents, where some campaign cash can really go a long way.

Kroll's 2016 campaign budget was $16,000.

Also, while looking that up I discovered that he's been fined for ****ing up campaign financing disclosures.

Talking point #2.
 
Hey, you gotta start somewhere.

If I can ever write bigger checks than that to support the CU AD, I will!

Seriously folks, if you give anything at all to the AD, your donation would probably have a bigger impact if it was targeted towards (or against) the regents' political campaigns. Especially the district regents, where some campaign cash can really go a long way.

Kroll's 2016 campaign budget was $16,000.

Also, while looking that up I discovered that he's been fined for ****ing up campaign financing disclosures.

Talking point #2.

Individual #1?
SociableDeafeningJunco-size_restricted.gif
 
Nobody was panicking. We all knew it would go through. It doesn't change the fact that if it wasn't unanimous decision it's a bad look. Also, Ziskin is kind of a tool, tbh.
It's a bad look in the eyes of nut job fans. No one else will care or remember in three days.
 
Back
Top