I wish I could just go around and fine people who have no accountability towards me. That would be awesome (and I'd be rich).Totally biased crew. Pac12 should call them out and fine them.
I wish I could just go around and fine people who have no accountability towards me. That would be awesome (and I'd be rich).Totally biased crew. Pac12 should call them out and fine them.
Gamboa hit the CSU player on about the 41 yard line when the line of scrimmage was the 38 so as I understand the rules there cannot be pass interference if it's behind the line of scrimmageI trust you guys are ripping the officials for not calling PI on the pick six?
Got away with a pretty major one there. But took some hits on bad calls too. Unfortunately it doesn't always even out, but having officiated a bit in kid's programs, I have trouble complaining, it's a tough assignment. Shouldn't miss when the replay is reviewed though, especially when it's obvious.No, but we did get away with one. Good point.
FIB has a good point. Gamboa hit him in the csu backfield. I'm not sure what the rule is there. He did hit him slightly before the ball arrived, for sure.Got away with a pretty major one there. But took some hits on bad calls too. Unfortunately it doesn't always even out, but having officiated a bit in kid's programs, I have trouble complaining, it's a tough assignment. Shouldn't miss when the replay is reviewed though, especially when it's obvious.
That's how I saw it too, that Nembot was engaged with him and violently yanked his shoulder pads up and dislodged the helmet. Cost us four points.I am curious about Nembot's illegal hands to the face call on the Kenney penalty. In stadium the replay seemed to show his shoulder pad knocked off his helmet and Nembot barely touched the side of his helmet. Not sure though.
Go watch it again, cause you're wrong.That's how I saw it too, that Nembot was engaged with him and violently yanked his shoulder pads up and dislodged the helmet. Cost us four points.
Agree, we DID win the game.Bitching about officiating is a loser's lament.
I actually like bitching about officiating when we win, because it is specifically not a loser's lament.Bitching about officiating is a loser's lament.
I actually like bitching about officiating when we win, because it is specifically not a loser's lament.
UBL, I think.
The receiver was 2 yards behind the line of scrimmage. From everything I could find, there cannot be PI behind the line. However, there could be, say, holding, which wasn't the case either. But I cannot find the specific language as it applies to the NCAA.So, can we get a ruling? It's not like I ever interact with CSU fans, but on the off-chance I'm feeling quaint and want to catch a shearing competition in West Maryland I might run into one, and I want to be armed.
1. Was the pass which resulted in an interception behind the line of scrimmage for sure?
2. What are the rules in college football? I did my google magic and determined that there is NO DPI behind the line of scrimmage in the NFL. In college football, my reading is that there can be no DPI if the ball does not pass the neutral zone. The neutral zone, as I understand it, is only a football width further than the LOS. Am I reading that correctly?
So I'm looking for confirmation that the pass did not cross the neutral zone, and additionally seeking confirmation that there can be no pass interference if it, in fact, did not.
Help?
Not benign at all. It gave us time to set up a FG attempt as time ran out. Thanks refs!Don't forget the botched clock management by the refs when they forgot to run the clock after CSU ran the ball for short yardage and didn't get a first down. The commentators went on and on about how the game clock should have been running, but was not.
This error was benign, and didn't imact anything, but was just another example of sloppiness.
Bitching about officiating is a loser's lament.
We should biiicchh about reffing when it is bad. Whether we win or lose there is a level of quality expected out of the officiating and review crew. Though we wont see this crew again, they very clearly are not working to the standards we expect from FBS refs.
Pac12 reffing was absolutely terrible last year. We all complained about it, it was clear to Larry Scott that quality refs are necessary for a quality conference and heads rolled:
http://www.cougcenter.com/wsu-couga...12-referees-blown-calls-tony-corrente-resigns
I watched the Umass/Temple game and that was almost analogously full of bad calls to (and ridiculous reviews). Unfortunately Umass (and CU by proxy) got the short end of the stick on most of these.
Nice! In fact, I think the RB is still planted at the 42 yard line, so can someone drop by Mile High and confirm visually that he was behind the LOS?
uhhhhThere cannot be PI if it's not a forward pass. It's the same logic that dictates if a pass behind the LOS is dropped it's still a live ball and considered a fumble.
There cannot be PI if it's not a forward pass. It's the same logic that dictates if a pass behind the LOS is dropped it's still a live ball and considered a fumble.
There cannot be PI if it's not a forward pass. It's the same logic that dictates if a pass behind the LOS is dropped it's still a live ball and considered a fumble.