My first thought in reading part of this, didn't read it all because I could sense the direction it was going and we have already been there, was is this Big Jim's sock or somebody else's sock.
We have a brand new poster with a total of 3 post, all of which are in this thread, trying to rip CU a new one over territory that has already been covered and acting like this reaches the levels of Baylor, Penn State, Nebraska, or Miami.
No question the situation could have been handled better. Had HCMM and RG been specialist in the area of DV they probably would have, same with Dr. Phil. They did the prudent thing and acted on the advice of counsel, like it or not this has been established. Even if they had acted sooner they could not have acted soon enough to make the complainers happy. Again until they had legal grounds which came with the PPO they could not act just on the word of an at the time alleged victim who stated she did not want to involve police and/or prosecute.
What has also been established is that A) The right conclusion was eventually reached in asking and receiving the resignation and all information being turned over to the authorities. B) Every indication that this was an isolated incident, not in any way an indicator of a climate that supports, encourages, or protects violence against women or others.
If someone is asking for discipline such as suspensions or terminations against members of the CU staff then they are simply being reactionary idiots. There was no intent to hide or protect an abuser. The people involved did the best they could under the circumstances and with the knowledge and experience they have.