It's an interesting way of showing how a generally accepted standard (W/L%) do not apply to every situation. Not to state too much of the obvious but for this phase of his CU career, Tad is more appropriately measured by post-season appearances and 20 win seasons (3 for 3) as a standard for measuring success relative to CU and the bball programs historical performance.
My big problem with this is it treats the NIT equal to the dance