Steve821980
Well-Known Member
Don't even say his name...It's their prediction, not mine. Ease up, Stevie. There's no B_Walkin' here.
Don't even say his name...It's their prediction, not mine. Ease up, Stevie. There's no B_Walkin' here.
With your predictions, the Buffs go to a bowl if they lose both ASU and USC.I was just looking at the schedule and after watching the other teams, I think a bowl appearance comes down to either a win at ASU or a win against USC. If I'm picking between those two teams I think it's too hard to win in Tempe and we are overdue/it's a home game against USC.
Then again the sky is the limit this year if the Buffs continue to improve. I don't see a W at Oregon, Washington, or at Utah regardless.
Airforce Win
@ASU Loss (Swing Game)
UA Win
@UO Loss
@ WSU Loss
USC Win (Swing Game)
@ UCLA Win
Stanford Win
Washington Loss
@ Utah Loss
That’s not good. Better after the second half against CSU but that is not encouraging
31 points isn't what we want, but it's not as bad as most think. Average points for a team is around 27 these days, iirc.Back to back weeks of allowing 31 pts too. Defense gives up WAY too much in the 1st half. They seriously lock-in after half time though. They need to figure out before we get into Pac-12 play though, because the offense won't always be able to bail them out.
31 points isn't what we want, but it's not as bad as most think. Average points for a team is around 27 these days, iirc.
As long as we keep playing good offense and winning the turnover battle for those extra possessions, giving points in that range is still winning football. I'd love to see that number get down into the mid twenties, though, so we could have confidence that our offense delivering 30 or more in a game is almost always going to be enough to win.
I would argue CU is about what we expected: Good offense, questionable but improving defense.
It's the rest of the schedule that has changed a bit:
About what we expected:
Zona still beatable
Jury still out:
Utah. Don't look great, don't look awful.
Wash state: Thanks for not losing to a FCS school yet this year.
Easier games:
ASU looks like trash. Glad we're getting them early
Stanford doesn't look like anything special
UCLA LOL
Washington doesn't look like a no hoper
Harder
USC looks like they might figure it out.
Oregon looks good.
I think our floor is we win:
AFA
2 of ASU, Zona, UCLA
1 of Stanford, Washington, Washington state, Utah
0 of Oregon, USC
6 win floor, baby!!!
They destroyed stanford. Theyve definitely figured out SOMETHING. It seems like with the switch to the spread they are actually using the talent they have on offense instead of letting it all go to waste, which is scaryUSC hasn't figured anything out-After Saturday, they play Utah at home, and then go to Washington and Notre Dame for their next three (I think there's a bye in there too). They could easily be 3-3 when Arizona goes out there. Let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Yeah and the main concern with this team was depth on defense. We are two games in so it is too early to say that won't come back to hurt us still. That and Nebraska just isn't a great football team right now, imo, so we can't put too much on a home game against them.I voted 6-6 at the beginning of the season (no specificity about where they'd come from) and I think I'm staying put with that prediction. The team showed grit in two consecutive 2nd halves, but the 1st halves leave a lot to be desired. A lot.
Until they show me 4 solid quarters, I'm going to assume we're going to occasionally get too far behind for comebacks. Especially on the road.
They destroyed stanford. Theyve definitely figured out SOMETHING. It seems like with the switch to the spread they are actually using the talent they have on offense instead of letting it all go to waste, which is scary
I saw a better one but I can't find it. It had AM basically standing on his head.
They destroyed stanford. Theyve definitely figured out SOMETHING. It seems like with the switch to the spread they are actually using the talent they have on offense instead of letting it all go to waste, which is scary
The Buffs finish the season 7-3? That would be a magical season!I had 7-5 at the beginning of the season, a little optimistic could have been 6-6. But after these two games I feel like with HCMT we will never be out of a game and our fight is the best we've seen in years. Here are my updated w-l, go buffs!
Airforce - Win
@ASU - Win
UA - Win
@UO - Loss
@ WSU - Win (Swing Game)
USC - Win (Swing Game)
@ UCLA - Win
Stanford - Win
Washington - Loss (Swing Game)
@ Utah - Loss (Swing Game)
The Buffs finish the season 7-3? That would be a magical season!
I can’t describe what Arias did. It was some sort of brain fart aided by the kicker’s embellishment. It was just a weird play.Meh, players can be coached to attempt a block and not run into the kicker. You have to run to a spot well in front of the punter. Arias erred, but I’m not gonna fret about an effort mistake.
I honestly have no idea what to expect from this team.
On one hand, Montez is an excellent deep ball thrower who seems to show up when we really need it. On the other hand he lacks toughness and turtles when pressure is on.
Nine wins would be 2016 type of magic, but 8 wins isn't completely out of the question, IMO. That was my optimistic prediction in preseason. It's all a fluid situation, but through two weeks, the only teams on the schedule who I view as very likely losses/no hopers are Oregon and Utah on the road. Stanford looks much worse than most originally thought, USC in Boulder, UW doesn't appear to be the world beater we thought they would be and it's in Boulder, and while WSU has played well in their first two JV games, I don't necessarily view them as a sure loss either. On top of that, ASU, UA, UCLA and Stanford should all very winnable games.NINE wins in Coach Tucker’s first year?
I don’t think I can afford the drugs to make me see this, but I certainly will sample some at the Bowl Game.
Yeah, I would actually say Montez seems to play better when there's pressure.Uh.... did you watch the game last week? I would say that the pressure was pretty well "on" in the second half vs the nubs and all he did was go 15/21 for 291 yds, 2 TDs and 0 INTs. That's a 71.4% completion and a 13.8 YPA. That includes that absolutely gorgeous TD pass to Tony Brown with 46 seconds left to tie the game.
Even if you take out The Flea Flicker he was 14/20 for 195 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 70% cmp, 9.75 YPA.
Uh.... did you watch the game last week? I would say that the pressure was pretty well "on" in the second half vs the nubs and all he did was go 15/21 for 291 yds, 2 TDs and 0 INTs. That's a 71.4% completion and a 13.8 YPA. That includes that absolutely gorgeous TD pass to Tony Brown with 46 seconds left to tie the game.
Even if you take out The Flea Flicker he was 14/20 for 195 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 70% cmp, 9.75 YPA.
Glad you said it, that was the most off base take I've seen in awhile.Yeah, I would actually say Montez seems to play better when there's pressure.
Uh.... did you watch the game last week? I would say that the pressure was pretty well "on" in the second half vs the nubs and all he did was go 15/21 for 291 yds, 2 TDs and 0 INTs. That's a 71.4% completion and a 13.8 YPA. That includes that absolutely gorgeous TD pass to Tony Brown with 46 seconds left to tie the game.
Even if you take out The Flea Flicker he was 14/20 for 195 yds, 1 TD, 0 INT, 70% cmp, 9.75 YPA.