The description of DiStefano as a spineless boot licker is pretty accurate, IMO. He does what he's told to do. He doesn't really show any leadership, though. Brad has his example, but I have my own that I've shared once or twice.
It's 2011 at a Rotary Conference. DiStefano is there, participating in a forum of local higher-ups in Colorado Higher Ed. He starts spouting off about how we (CU) needs to be better at Freshmen retention. He is talking to a crowd that is big on education, so he figures he has a sympathetic ear. He brings up a bunch of statistics about how CU Freshmen drop out at an alarming rate, and blah, blah, blah. I mean, he's really getting into it. This is obviously a really, really big issue for him, right?
Thing is, CU is designed that way. It's MEANT to weed out 30% of the incoming Freshmen every year. The year of my Freshman orientation, the Chancellor (Corbridge at the time), told us to each look at the kid sitting to our left, then to the kid on our right, then at ourselves. He said that it was very likely that one of those three would be gone within three years. It's always been that way, and probably always will be. It's no big deal. That's what CU is. But Phil, when addressing a group that he thinks wants to hear about how CU is attending to the needs of all of it's students, goes off on how important it is to improve the Freshman retention rate. He doesn't give a rip about that. Never has. Never will. But it sounded good at the time. But that's Phil. Say whatever you think your audience wants to hear. And be passionate about it... at least for a while.