I need statistical evidence to believe this post.Something, something, polyorrchidism.
/burrito
I need statistical evidence to believe this post.Something, something, polyorrchidism.
/burrito
We're losing to better teams now than we were two weeks ago! That's tangible improvement you can sell to recruits!!! !
Skidmark, the word to use to hide an image is "hide", not "spoiler".
(In case you want to edit in the selfie of your 3-pack sack again.)
Mine are swollen and bruised.Balls.
Kicked and kicked and kicked again.
Mine are swollen and bruised.
Ouch.
That hurt so much. I was there. The team had momentum. the crowd was in it. Ouch.
Yeah, I had the same concern. We had them gassed and that break gave them a big breather.I was sure we were gonna win in OT until Tedric went down. took the energy out of the stadium to some degree, and gave the UCLA defense a loooooooong break. After that, I felt like the loss was gonna come cause we wouldn't get the stops we needed unless the O woke up.
Fair point. I should have tried new material.
'Tini is the kind of guy who would argue the average human has one breast and one testicle.
Should have won today.
****.
I guess our new thing is being used to brutally close losses. I was much more distraught after Cal and OSU. Beats being numb to losing by 40 like a couple years ago, but ****, at some point this program has to catch a ****ing break and win some ****ing games. When you have a chance to win, ****ing go for it. I know Sefo being mistake prone is part, but playing for field goals as an underdog isn't going to bring wins.
Tedric was spying Hundley all game to, don't think it's a coincidence that they ran him afterI was sure we were gonna win in OT until Tedric went down. took the energy out of the stadium to some degree, and gave the UCLA defense a loooooooong break. After that, I felt like the loss was gonna come cause we wouldn't get the stops we needed unless the O woke up.
I guess I'm not seeing anything that would suggest future greatness. Future mediocrity, at best, but there have to be serious questions about the willingness of the staff to take the risks necessary to even be good, let alone great.Thinking about it all night this is it guys. We are going to be rewarded for all this. The Buffs are going to be great again and soon. Year before last, we would have been done at the end of the first qtr. I just wish the kids could celebrate, they deserve a win. The BUFFS are on their way back.
And those risks are...?I guess I'm not seeing anything that would suggest future greatness. Future mediocrity, at best, but there have to be serious questions about the willingness of the staff to take the risks necessary to even be good, let alone great.
Glad you can see into the future. How should I invest in the stock market? I assume you expected Mac to come in here and immediately make the team older, bigger, stronger and load 'em up with 4 and 5 star guys. Any thinking person knew that this was not going to be easy and would take time. No instant gratification unless you take over an underachieving group and turn them around.I guess I'm not seeing anything that would suggest future greatness. Future mediocrity, at best, but there have to be serious questions about the willingness of the staff to take the risks necessary to even be good, let alone great.
And those risks are...?
You can't be serious?And those risks are...?
Glad you can see into the future. How should I invest in the stock market? I assume you expected Mac to come in here and immediately make the team older, bigger, stronger and load 'em up with 4 and 5 star guys. Any thinking person knew that this was not going to be easy and would take time. No instant gratification unless you take over an underachieving group and turn them around.
John Fox is "risk averse." Many coaches are "risk averse." Managing just about anything is managing risk. They are only "risk averse" when a play doesn't work. Second guessing after the fact is so damned easy. If we could get do overs every time, we'd all be great coaches.Of course it's going to take time. I never said otherwise. But to argue the fact that this staff is extremely risk-adverse is arguing for the sake of arguing.