Should those false start and holding penalties be blamed on coaching too?
I think we lead the nation I'm false starts.
When we were up by 10 late I knew we were gonna lose. I can't be the only one....
You can't blitz every play, they'll hand off or dump it to #23 who is a gasher. Too often, bad happened to them but then they had someone (often Pittman, guy's a player) wide open for a first down. Their receivers seem to know where the first down markers are...when they called some blitzes good things happened. If it was a 3 man rush, our only hope was that their guy dropped the ball.
I had the same thought.The end of last nights game was eerily similar to the end of the Arizona game. Fool me once.....
I don’t know. Maybe because thelr safeties will crowd the box if they know were gonna run it every snap. Call me crazy.We played great. Why are we going deep rather than run the ball? We had success all game running it.
They had two deep safety’s a lot of the gameI don’t know. Maybe because thelr safeties will crowd the box if they know were gonna run it every snap. Call me crazy.
then there’s the fact that WR is one of the most talented units on the field.
we’re not a complete team. Guys commit penalties but we don’t have the depth to bench them.
Tucker went after the refs a couple of times.Terrible Q4 play calling and time management. Montez was loopy after the target...just goes to show that QB2 and QB3 are not going to be viable options, atleast this year...even though Senstrom seemed ready to game.
Tucker never challenges any questionable calls. Maybe he sees how biased P12 refs are? The buffs were literally 15 minutes from a big time P12 victory, and it bounced out of their hands like the missed TO opportunities on defense.
MT seems a bit conservative when it comes to game management for my tastes, but most coaches are.
What does bother me is we seem to be a mess at times. Plays don't get called it or players aren't on the same page. That crap is definitely on the staff and they need to un**** themselves because it happens way too much. Players just seem generally lost sometimes and it looks to stem from the playcalls not getting in properly.
MT being conservative is the one thing I was hoping would've changed. I had a feeling this game would come down to MT going for it on fourth. That wasn't necessarily the case but punting twice inside the 40 and one of those (maybe both) we take a delay of game...wtf? Someone needs to tell MT we play at a mile high and we have a good kicker
I agree the call was to go for it, I guess my point was anything but a puntStefanou is accurate, but he doesn't have a big leg. Not sure we were within his range. He's 1-4 lifetime from beyond 50 and we were at the 35 or so? The call was to go for it, expecting the defense to stop anyone when it matters just isn't gonna happen. Maybe at Georgia punting it is the play, but at CU with the 120th ranked defense, go for it.
Stefanou is accurate, but he doesn't have a big leg. Not sure we were within his range. He's 1-4 lifetime from beyond 50 and we were at the 35 or so? The call was to go for it, expecting the defense to stop anyone when it matters just isn't gonna happen. Maybe at Georgia punting it is the play, but at CU with the 120th ranked defense, go for it.
I still don't know if I think that was the difference maker in the game. If we miss a kick there or fail to convert on 4th down, USC scores anyway and we've got a little more time to play with. Here's where I think we lost-
1. Penalties-too many. Some of them were questionable, sure (see the late hit on Landman as an example), but I see at least two examples of holding penalties on the OL that killed drives as examples. That's lack of talent.
2. We wasted two timeouts early in the second half for dumb sideline stuff-plays coming into too slow, not lining up properly, etc. We keep those-MAYBE we get the ball back with a minute-ish to go. Still would need a miracle, but its another opportunity That's on the staff.
3. Two fumbles-and they scored on both drives regardless. On the one on the GW drive, they lost 10-putting them in 2nd/20. They got 19 yards on that play. Inexcusable.
I like Tucker a lot still, but I'm wondering about some of these ACs he brought with him. Gotta have better recruiters in spots, and we've also gotta make sure we're putting the talent we do have in the best spots for success. Secondary being a great example-probably their best game of the year and they were helped by having as good a pass rush as we've seen all year. I'd like to see us try and upgrade at some of these spots.
There were also several substitution issues.obviously the overall coaching management was a wee bit iffy down the stretch, but what the **** goes on when we just look like a jumbled peewee mess? We had to burn two timeouts because we couldn't even get the playcall in
I wouldn't call it the difference maker, but it was one of several. If we recover one of the fumbles, possibly changes the game. If we didn't get penalized here or there, possibly changes the game. If we get a first down there and get into FG range and convert that, possible difference maker. If Montez doesn't get concussed and look like **** after, maybe we win the game. If Stenstrom stays in the game and we run 100% of the time throughout the 4th quarter, maybe we win the game.
I agree some of the ACs just aren't good. The defense is a mess at best and that's with MT bringing several of "his" guys. If he has MM level loyalty for his guys, we might be in trouble. But we don't know yet, he might get rid of his guys faster than we think. I will say Kap has the OL playing quite well, but their penalties are ****ing killing us at times. The false starts inside the 5 are just cringe worthy.
Nice logo!I don’t know. Maybe because thelr safeties will crowd the box if they know were gonna run it every snap. Call me crazy.
then there’s the fact that WR is one of the most talented units on the field.
we’re not a complete team. Guys commit penalties but we don’t have the depth to bench them.
We wouldn’t be having this conversation if we recover the fumble on their game winning drive. We had the sack, the ball on the ground and we missed our chance seal the game.MT being conservative is the one thing I was hoping would've changed. I had a feeling this game would come down to MT going for it on fourth. That wasn't necessarily the case but punting twice inside the 40 and one of those (maybe both) we take a delay of game...wtf? Someone needs to tell MT we play at a mile high and we have a good kicker
You’re either coaching it or allowing it to happen. Most overused phrase in CFB. This team is not disciplined in the slightest
Agree 100% run the ****ing ball when we were in USC territory in the 4th and game over. Coaches are always over thinking and outsmarting themselves. The players deserved this game, coaches ****ed it up.