Bah - I'm not angry about that. The hire, for those who haven't taken a little time to digest it and listen to Embree, should be a head scratcher. I care a lot more about what they will say about the hire in another 5 years than I care about what they say about it now. Remember, Hawk was a "home run" hire. That turned out great.
Mad at whom? CU? or SI?
Bah - I'm not angry about that. The hire, for those who haven't taken a little time to digest it and listen to Embree, should be a head scratcher. I care a lot more about what they will say about the hire in another 5 years than I care about what they say about it now. Remember, Hawk was a "home run" hire. That turned out great.
tend to agree here. though, do seem a little harsh. the "A" hires seem suspect to me. anybody but Bear Bryant or Darrel Royal to Indiana can't be an A.
stewart mandel is not a believer. Prove him wrong is all Embree can do.
Also, Mandel graded the Hawk hire as an A. So I consider this good news.
It isn't a totally invalid take.
I agree that Embo has a lot to prove, but I'd hire him over a lot of coaches on that list. Jerry Kill? Who the **** is that?
Old news. It was written back on January 19th. (Yes, I bookmarked it so that I can throw it in Mandel's face after Embree makes us a bowl regular again. :nod: )
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...del/01/19/coaching-football-grades/index.html
I have a hard time getting angry about what some random columnist writes about a coaching hire six months before the guy's first game.
i wasn't angry until i opened the link. he's got embree listed 11th out of 11. therefore, he must be castrated. it is the natural order of the innerwebz. try to keep up.
:lol: