It's the gem of the southwest.
Gallup doesn't hold a candle to Tucson.
It's the gem of the southwest.
Gallup doesn't hold a candle to Tucson.
Gallup doesn't hold a candle to Tucson.
Clovis, El Paso, Pueblo, Barstow, and the military-industrial complex would like your consideration
That's tough. All it takes is one bad game, and you get bounced.
They had a chance last year and failed, now I'm giving them 5 more tries. That's 6 bad games. You simply have to break through at some point if you're recruiting at the level they're at right now.
They had a chance last year and failed, now I'm giving them 5 more tries. That's 6 bad games. You simply have to break through at some point if you're recruiting at the level they're at right now.
I dunno. I'm sure Zona fans feel similarly. Winning a title is the only outcome they would find satisfying.
But look at Roy Williams at Kansas. Regularly brought in top classes, but could not bring home a National Title. It's tough because as good as they are, they won't be the best team most years. And you're having to win six straight games. One mediocre game by you, or one great game by a similarly talented team and you're going home. The first couple might be easier, but after that you often face 3-4 straight teams that can beat you. Not easy.
It's a little deceiving to say "UA hasn't made a final 4 in forever" and act like they haven't been close or good enough to get there. They've had some really bad luck in the elite 8 to be fair. The huge meltdown against Illinois in the final minutes, and the Derrick Williams year they had two clean shots on the last play to advance and rimmed both. Ask any UConn fan about that game and they'll say they were very fortunate to get by. Ohio State also beat them on the last play in the Sweet 16 a few years ago. Last year they just got beat by Frank the Tank, but again it was another Elite 8 appearance, and they were down Brandon Ashley.
I'm not saying that UA is the only team to have bad luck in the tournament, or that anyone should be saying they're the top program right now. I'm just saying it's very unfair to say since they haven't won a title that they've failed, or to group them with other teams that haven't won it in that stretch.
Maybe if Colorado gets to the point that it's a title contender on a yearly basis and starts barely missing out, you'll realize there's a big difference between that and just being an average or above average program.
Winning a national title is tough. College basketball isn't like college football. In college football, there are maybe 10 teams that have a legitimate chance at a title. That number drops as the year goes on. In college hoops, there's probably 25 teams that, if the chips fall just right, could win a championship. UA is definitely in that group. CU isn't - yet. I think we're getting close, though. Once we're consistenly getting into the round of 32 and 16, then we'll be in that group, too. We're not there.
It's a little deceiving to say "UA hasn't made a final 4 in forever" and act like they haven't been close or good enough to get there. They've had some really bad luck in the elite 8 to be fair. The huge meltdown against Illinois in the final minutes, and the Derrick Williams year they had two clean shots on the last play to advance and rimmed both. Ask any UConn fan about that game and they'll say they were very fortunate to get by. Ohio State also beat them on the last play in the Sweet 16 a few years ago. Last year they just got beat by Frank the Tank, but again it was another Elite 8 appearance, and they were down Brandon Ashley.
Maybe if Colorado gets to the point that it's a title contender on a yearly basis and starts barely missing out, you'll realize there's a big difference between that and just being an average or above average program.
UCLA doesn't have a fan base. Being in the PAC-12 a number of years now you'd think you guys would realize this. They renovated their whole arena and brought in the best class in the nation two years ago and still couldn't put butts in the seats. Yes they are a Blue Blood but right now Arizona owns this conference. We have the national recognition, fan base, money, talent, etc... UCLA is in our shadow now. That can't be denied.Weak talk. Maybe if Dinwiddie doesn't tear his ACL, you're not on here talking smack. Maybe if the refs weren't scared, they'd confirm the Chen buzzer beater in Tucson. What ifs is weak talk. Save that for a Zona board, no sympathy here.
UofA has already brought in elite classes yet couldn't beat CU, Washington, or UCLA for a P12 tourney title. UCLA is the only blue blood west of the Mississippi. I never see their fans trolling on our board because they know that. They don't need to prove anything. I like Miller and I want to see P12 teams regularly make Final 4s, but UofA is hard to root for because 90% of their fan base are petty and juvenile.
UCLA doesn't have a fan base. Being in the PAC-12 a number of years now you'd think you guys would realize this. They renovated their whole arena and brought in the best class in the nation two years ago and still couldn't put butts in the seats. Yes they are a Blue Blood but right now Arizona owns this conference. We have the national recognition, fan base, money, talent, etc... UCLA is in our shadow now. That can't be denied.
You guys put way too much weight into the P12 tournament. Sure its nice to win and adds a trophy to your case but about the only thing it does is buy you an auto bid or helps your seeding in the real tournament, you know the one that actually matters. The actual PAC-12 champ is determined in the regular season. Not during a weekend in Vegas.It cannot be denied that CU has more P12 tournament titles, either.
Owning the conference means owning and holding on to that special piece of P12 hardware.
No doubt the 13-14 team was good when hitting on all cylinders. But all that national recognition, fan base, money, talent, etc didn't help in Vegas and sure didn't help in either you or my NCAA tournament brackets last April.
a little humility wouldn't kill you.
You guys put way too much weight into the P12 tournament. Sure its nice to win and adds a trophy to your case but about the only thing it does is buy you an auto bid or helps your seeding in the real tournament, you know the one that actually matters. The actual PAC-12 champ is determined in the regular season. Not during a weekend in Vegas.
Lawrence, Kansas is west of the mighty Mississippi.
**** KU.
But let's not pretend that program isn't a blue blood.
UCLA doesn't have a fan base. Being in the PAC-12 a number of years now you'd think you guys would realize this. They renovated their whole arena and brought in the best class in the nation two years ago and still couldn't put butts in the seats. Yes they are a Blue Blood but right now Arizona owns this conference. We have the national recognition, fan base, money, talent, etc... UCLA is in our shadow now. That can't be denied.
You guys put way too much weight into the P12 tournament. Sure its nice to win and adds a trophy to your case but about the only thing it does is buy you an auto bid or helps your seeding in the real tournament, you know the one that actually matters. The actual PAC-12 champ is determined in the regular season. Not during a weekend in Vegas.
You guys put way too much weight into the P12 tournament. Sure its nice to win and adds a trophy to your case but about the only thing it does is buy you an auto bid or helps your seeding in the real tournament, you know the one that actually matters. The actual PAC-12 champ is determined in the regular season. Not during a weekend in Vegas.
Why would Miller say otherwise? He's the freakin head coach. Bottom line is it really only matters when you are a bubble team trying to make the dance. Arizona doesn't appear it will be in that position for a long time.If it weren't a big deal, then why did Sean Miller make winning the tournament a team goal?
You sure like to pick and choose when U of A is awesome.
UCLA certainly has a fan base, they just have better things to do than be trolls all day. They also beat Zona in the title game 5 months ago and produced 3 1st rd picks while Uofa had 1. Not to mention that they've actually played in Final 4s in the last decade. Heck of a shadow you've got, Napoleon.
Why would Miller say otherwise? He's the freakin head coach. Bottom line is it really only matters when you are a bubble team trying to make the dance. Arizona doesn't appear it will be in that position for a long time.
This is what it looks like pretty much every tipoff, save for a UA game when those empty seats are filled with red.
Why would Miller say otherwise? He's the freakin head coach. Bottom line is it really only matters when you are a bubble team trying to make the dance. Arizona doesn't appear it will be in that position for a long time.