Our conference is too tough? Our team is a tragedy. I'm glad it our fans the aspire to ballet rather than our players!
This conference is a complete bitch any given year. The media in the East doesn't get it. Who has Clemson played besides Notre Dame? Have you looked at Bailers schedule? The Big 12 is a joke, most teams there have only beat a couple teams with a winning record. The PAC killed itself this year because almost everyone here can beat your ass any given week. Welcome to the gun club. Enjoy.Anyone who blames the conference for CU's ineptitude needs to take a long look in the mirror.
CU's nosedive into sucky irrelevance is 100% self-inflicted, regardless of conference affiliation.
Welcome to the gun club. Enjoy.
This is exactly what the Beaver fans said after we snuck up on them and ruined their dream season.This conference is a complete bitch any given year. The media in the East doesn't get it. Who has Clemson played besides Notre Dame? Have you looked at Bailers schedule? The Big 12 is a joke, most teams there have only beat a couple teams with a winning record. The PAC killed itself this year because almost everyone here can beat your ass any given week. Welcome to the gun club. Enjoy.
It wasn't just the 90 season, it seems as though there were several seasons after, in which CU's schedule was ranked toughest in the nation.What is it with you and gun references?
And who the **** are you to welcome CU to the P12 or big boy football, Sally.
Take a peak at CU's 1990 schedule and let me know if Utah has ever faced anything tougher.
Yeah, CU fans know a thing or two about meat grinders.
But the lammies knocked off that mighty juggernaut UNLV in front of 15,000 rabid fans!! Thank goodness they're building a much needed new stadium.The big 12 is the least stable conference out of the five, no one wants to be in it, even oklahoma is sick of what is going on.
What pisses me off about Kiszla is the constant bitching about how colorado can't conpete with the big boys while all he talks about is trying to get cSU into a bigger conference. So colorado can't compete in the pac but csu who didn't even win their division last year in their best year in a decade should move up into a power conference? He is just a complete hypocrite.
There should be a desire to compete with the biggest and best schools in this country.
You're treading on thin ice quoting Jizla. Doesn't he just publish that same tired article year after year? Lazy, banal, pointless "journalism".
It wasn't just the 90 season, it seems as though there were several seasons after, in which CU's schedule was ranked toughest in the nation.
We definitely miss the revenue all the visitors used to bring us. Personally, I'll live without all the Red, Purple, and burnt Orange.
And as soon as CU gets bowl competitive, Folsom will be packed again.
That was always something that I believed was a problem with CU football culture. Too much of the attendance was about the opponent instead of about seeing the Buffs. The most successful programs have a culture where every game is an "event" because the home team is playing and the opponent hardly matters. CU was reliant on selling the opponent. That's being forced to change and it is a good thing.
Well, I posted it, mainly, because I read our attendance stats yesterday and kind of had the question in my mind. I then decided to make a thread after reading his column. If he's asking the question, others will.
In other news, water is wet and the sky is blue.The consensus is that it was not a bad move to come to the Pac and Kiszla sucks.
Was moving to the Pac a mistake?
Yesto me, the more interesting question to ask Allbuffs would be "was it a mistake to reject the Pac offer in 1994?"
What's more fun on T+1, ****braska or Utah?
CU v Utah is not very interesting to me. NU vs. CU has real hate. Cultures intertwined. Utah has this relationship with another school: BYU. And now that's been thrown out the window as well. All in the name of cash money. What a shame.
You can look at it a number of ways, but no matter how you look at it, the answer is always the same: no.
It's true we would probably have a better record in the Big 12, but that assumes the league didn't disintegrate the way it did. I'd love to have ****braska and Missouri on the schedule this year. Thing is, they both left, too. So from a football perspective, the answer is "no".
From a revenue standpoint, it's not even an argument. We don't get these facilities done in the Big 12.
From a non-football perspective, it's also not even an argument. Every sport we have has improved significantly since the move to the PAC 12. Every. One.
So, once again, Jizla steps on his crank and publishes a poorly constructed and half witted piece of drivel that is somehow supposed to make us question the move. This from the retard who suggested we would be better off in the MWC. He needs to go sniff Dante Bichete's jock a little more.
Uh, just to let you know, Wetmore's XC teams were top notch BEFORE joining the PAC 12. They've continued at the high level they were at .