While I disagree with Slider's point, I think it doesn't really deserve the response it's getting.
I don't think he's saying that Embree was a better coach than McIntyre.
Rather, his point is that the hire following Embree had to be one that we were 100% invested in for the long term, because it's going to be difficult to turn this one over in short order for performance (three coaches in five years...). I believe he was saying that this hire might have lacked the pedigree required for that kind of long term committment.
I'm still on board with HCMM, but I'm still scratching my head at the lack of toughness I saw along the D-line on Friday night.
This. Some people can't read apparently. HCMM>>>Embree.