So you've got nothingSorry bud but being ranked 85 and 114 respectively means absolutely nothing at that point. Just means that both teams are ****. 61% sounds like a lock!
Most of you are missing the significance of this game. This is the real test for MM. This is a very big game in my opinion. This, and the UU game, will tell you a lot about what kind of coach CU has.
Honestly, I think this game is bigger to Cal. Their AD is reeling, their new coach is flailing, they have lost 12 straight PAC 12 games and 14 overall to FBS teams. Losing to CU would push them over the cliff.Most of you are missing the significance of this game. This is the real test for MM. This is a very big game in my opinion. This, and the UU game, will tell you a lot about what kind of coach CU has.
So you've got nothing
No, not really. You're looking at Cal in a pretty shallow way. Cool they have talent and have recruited well, but it hasn't translated to the field for a myraid of reasons. Teams win and lose games on more than just talent. You aren't 1-9 overall, with a narrow win over a FCS team at that, if you aren't a bad team. We're not much better, but we are a better team and the only reason we win this game is because it's at home. At Cal and I think we lose.Meh. About as much as you. I know that Tedford left Cal a hell of a lot more talent across the board than Hawk or Embo. There are quite a few that still play per their depth chart. All 4 starting Olinemen 4* recruits, 4* WR, 4* RB, 4* DT, 4* DB, 4* QB. So far every team with superior talent than CU has blown our doors off. I don't expect that to change in this game. 61% is a mortal lock though so if you want to bet your penis pump that CU wins based on #85 over #114 I am sure Vegas will let you put your pump where your mouth is.
I will say this... if we lose to Cal this board will be in full-on meltdown mode
I will say this... if we lose to Cal this board will be in full-on meltdown mode
Most of you are missing the significance of this game. This is the real test for MM. This is a very big game in my opinion. This, and the UU game, will tell you a lot about what kind of coach CU has.
I will say this... if we lose to Cal this board will be in full-on meltdown mode
Meanwhile, it's big to CU of course, but we have the right coach and are on an upward trajectory (albeit glacial). MikeMac is 1-0 vs. Dykes, BTW...
We're actually favorites vs Cal
CU will find away to **** that up too. That is what we do, at CU.
What does this say about Washington State??One ugly streak will end in the Pac-12 this week when Colorado, which has lost 14 consecutive conference games, welcomes California, which has lost 12 league games in a row. Both teams’ last Pac-12 victory came against Washington State last season.
What does this say about Washington State??
http://www.ralphiereport.com/colora...-bites-colorado-vs-cal-who-will-break-through
:iagree:This game is an epic battle between two teams that have mastered the art of losing. If it were possible for both teams to lose that outcome would be the favorite in Vegas.
That said somebody has to win. Cal is more talented than us, who in BCS isn't. That said they are also the one team that may be as messed up this year as we were last year, a team that has bought into losing, that expects to lose and will find ways to do it.
On the other hand despite our lack of talent we have seen a gradual change in our team this year. We have won the game we were supposed to. We have continued to play and fight in most of the games that we had already lost due to the talent differences that led to us being out of games on the scoreboard.
Would I bet my mortgage on this game, I wouldn't even bet a dollar or a donut on this game. At the same time I do think that this week Cal goes home the loser that they have become and our PAC losing streak will be over for at least a week.
:lol: Rep!
Meh. About as much as you. I know that Tedford left Cal a hell of a lot more talent across the board than Hawk or Embo. There are quite a few that still play per their depth chart. All 4 starting Olinemen 4* recruits, 4* WR, 4* RB, 4* DT, 4* DB, 4* QB. So far every team with superior talent than CU has blown our doors off. I don't expect that to change in this game. 61% is a mortal lock though so if you want to bet your penis pump that CU wins based on #85 over #114 I am sure Vegas will let you put your pump where your mouth is.
No, not really. You're looking at Cal in a pretty shallow way. Cool they have talent and have recruited well, but it hasn't translated to the field for a myraid of reasons. Teams win and lose games on more than just talent. You aren't 1-9 overall, with a narrow win over a FCS team at that, if you aren't a bad team. We're not much better, but we are a better team and the only reason we win this game is because it's at home. At Cal and I think we lose.
I'm also not calling it a 'lock', but I'll take basically 60/40 odds for winning all day. I also very, very rarely bet on the Buffs (last time I believe was against USC in bball two years ago).
TiniSlapped!
Semper Gumby
Not really. Vegas wasn't even close.
Kom was sad because he did bet his penis pump.
Correction. It was Tini that put his pump where his mouth was and Vegas rewarded him. He knew that 61% was the lock of the century. #85 over #114 all day. Nice win for the Buffs.
Sigh, way to eat your crow. Your logic was absolutely correct and that's what we saw on Saturday. Oh wait, no you were completely wrong. Statistics and actual math > your logic
Correction. It was Twattro that put his pump where his mouth was and Vegas rewarded him. He knew that 61% was the lock of the century. #85 over #114 all day. Nice win for the Buffs. Put that new pump to work Twattro.