FlatironsBuff
Well-Known Member
I dunno if you can contend with the kewl sooner schooner /sarcasm
**** dude, UBT is probably driving to Florida right now to read you the riot act!!!:lol:
I dunno if you can contend with the kewl sooner schooner /sarcasm
That's not a poll, dumbass. That's the Nebraska state tree!!
Hawk doesn't get caught doing coke off a stripper's ass, I'll be in his corner. :thumbsup:
Minimum 3rd place in Big XII North.What I was trying to ask is; for you to support Hawkins to continue as the Buffs Coach what does he have to do this year and in the future?
I fully expect a loss to one of the "gimmes"... but I do expect a win against one of hte big boys. It is how young teams go.Minimum 3rd place in Big XII North.
MUST beat CSU, Toledo, Wyoming, K-State, A&M, and Iowa State.
Must win at least ONE game out of Kansas, Missouri, or ****braska.
Have to make a bowl appearance.
The six must win games should be slam dunks. If we lose any one of those, then pulling an upset against UT, WV, or OK State would probably be needed to undo a loss to one of the crap teams that we play this year.
and Hawk doesn't get caught doing coke off a stripper's ass, I'll be in his corner. :thumbsup:
I personally believe you give a coach at least 5 years. That's one full recruiting cycle. This rule of thumb may be broken, but only if there are valid reasons for doing so. Valid reasons are:
A. Major off-field issues.
B. If the team is just awful. Such as a record well below .500 and getting blown out on a regular basis. In other words not competitive. And while Hawk's record has not been great I don't think the team's performance has been awful save maybe 1 or 2 games.
So for this year, as long as we win at least, say, 5 games and Hawk doesn't get caught doing coke off a stripper's ass, I'll be in his corner. :thumbsup:
Agreed. My guess is that we get the late season surprise on OK State. I won't even venture a guess as to which "gimme" we might lose to as the thought of losing to any of them makes me something something.I fully expect a loss to one of the "gimmes"... but I do expect a win against one of hte big boys. It is how young teams go.
Hawk will be here in 2010 if the buffs win 0 games or 14 games.
key boosters
i think i might find him to be more endearing if such an event were to become public. i think i have issues.
:lol:
I personally believe you give a coach at least 5 years. That's one full recruiting cycle. This rule of thumb may be broken, but only if there are valid reasons for doing so. Valid reasons are:
A. Major off-field issues.
B. If the team is just awful. Such as a record well below .500 and getting blown out on a regular basis. In other words not competitive. And while Hawk's record has not been great I don't think the team's performance has been awful save maybe 1 or 2 games.
So for this year, as long as we win at least, say, 5 games and Hawk doesn't get caught doing coke off a stripper's ass, I'll be in his corner. :thumbsup:
i think those of you who suggest that a 3 or 4 win season wouldn't get him fired are misguided. you vastly underestimate the pressure that bohn would get in such a circumstance from the key boosters. remember that they didn't want to run gb out the door until the ugly finish to the last season and then the boosters came up with the money and out he went.
the same thing happened to mallory (it was believed by key boosters that he couldn't take the team to the next level... unfortunately, the next level was the depths of the fairbanks era).
the Buffs have had 3 consecutive losing season in their bread and butter revenue producing sport. a 4th such season and it will be very, very hard for hawkins to get a 5th year. recruiting will be seriously impacted.
this assumption that CU has endless patience for failure as long as they keep the team out of trouble is just not the real world. sure, this isn't bama or some other power where they will blow out a coaching staff willy-nilly. but, 4 consecutive losing seasons would be, imho, the final straw.
Anybody who thinks that Hawk is any danger of losing his job is a moron. He has three years on his contract, and we aint buying out anybody anytime soon, period.
Still laugh my ass off every time I look at your signature...classic.well, maybe you should become more familiar with the FACTS as opposed to expressing your OPINION in such a bitchy little way.
here's a fact for you. the buyout clause of hawk's contract is for an amount far less than the full value remaining.
oops. but i guess those that have expressed an opinion contrary to you are just "morons."
dumbass.
Anybody who thinks that Hawk is any danger of losing his job is a moron. He has three years on his contract, and we aint buying out anybody anytime soon, period.
Unfortunately, I agree with this post.As long as he's breathing by the end of the year and there are no major scandals, he'll be back next year.
That's one firing I could never understand, and I started school at CU when he came on board. He only had one losing season - his first in 1974. The next year he went 9 -3, and lost to Texas in the Bluebonnet Bowl. In 1976, he went 8 - 4, his team finished 1st in the Big 8 with a 5 - 2 record, and I'll never forget sitting in Folsom watching CU beat OU 42 - 31. Tony Reed, Laval Short, James Mayberry, Brian Cabral, and Donnie Hasselbeck - they lost close games to NU and Ohio State that year. Mallory was rough around the edges, and not a "slick media type" selling bull $hit like Chuck Fairbanks - so they got rid of him. Hawkins hasn't remotely sniffed the success Mallory had, and yet I think regardless of what he does this year, he will finish out his contract. You can thank Vicker's for that bonehead move - he sure knew how to pick a winner.:lol:i think those of you who suggest that a 3 or 4 win season wouldn't get him fired are misguided. you vastly underestimate the pressure that bohn would get in such a circumstance from the key boosters. remember that they didn't want to run gb out the door until the ugly finish to the last season and then the boosters came up with the money and out he went.
the same thing happened to mallory (it was believed by key boosters that he couldn't take the team to the next level... unfortunately, the next level was the depths of the fairbanks era).
the Buffs have had 3 consecutive losing season in their bread and butter revenue producing sport. a 4th such season and it will be very, very hard for hawkins to get a 5th year. recruiting will be seriously impacted.
this assumption that CU has endless patience for failure as long as they keep the team out of trouble is just not the real world. sure, this isn't bama or some other power where they will blow out a coaching staff willy-nilly. but, 4 consecutive losing seasons would be, imho, the final straw.
well, maybe you should become more familiar with the FACTS as opposed to expressing your OPINION in such a bitchy little way.
here's a fact for you. the buyout clause of hawk's contract is for an amount far less than the full value remaining.
oops. but i guess those that have expressed an opinion contrary to you are just "morons."
dumbass.
If you think Hawk is in any danger of losing his job after this year than you are a moron.