So we're on the "if you didn't play, you have no say" track again.
Listen - there's rancor among CU ALUMS, DONORS, and FANS because they see a group of people with obvious axes to grind running a scorched earth campaign to take down one guy. If you don't see it that way, fine. But a lot of us do. Now, I don't think anyone has ever said that everyone who has played or coached is on the "wrong side". There is a very small, very loud segment that is acting in a way that is hurting the image of the football program, the AD, and the University as a whole, both short-term and perhaps long.
I don't see any reason to not speak out about the way these people are acting. There's no reason to sit on our hands and bow our heads and say, "oh he played, he can say anything he wants, and I should just swallow my opinion". That's bull****. Especially when you, I, and everyone else can see that there is a very obvious reason for their actions, and it doesn't necessarily align with legitimate concerns about the long-term health of the program and AD as much as it aligns with short-term anger about their perception of how certain people were treated.
Listen - there's rancor among CU ALUMS, DONORS, and FANS because they see a group of people with obvious axes to grind running a scorched earth campaign to take down one guy. If you don't see it that way, fine. But a lot of us do. Now, I don't think anyone has ever said that everyone who has played or coached is on the "wrong side". There is a very small, very loud segment that is acting in a way that is hurting the image of the football program, the AD, and the University as a whole, both short-term and perhaps long.
I don't see any reason to not speak out about the way these people are acting. There's no reason to sit on our hands and bow our heads and say, "oh he played, he can say anything he wants, and I should just swallow my opinion". That's bull****. Especially when you, I, and everyone else can see that there is a very obvious reason for their actions, and it doesn't necessarily align with legitimate concerns about the long-term health of the program and AD as much as it aligns with short-term anger about their perception of how certain people were treated.