High probability: AFA, CSU
Battles: AZ, NU, UCLA, USC, Wazzu
Underdog: ASU, Oregon, Stanford
Longshot: Utah, Washington
Putting UCLA and USC in the “battles” category is aspirational.
Since joining the P12, CU has not won in at the Rose Bowl. And CU has never beaten USC at home or away. That’s why they got the Monkey call out from me. Clear the monkey, and then it’s easier for me to treat them like just another team.
Until those monkeys off are off CU’s back, I can’t bring myself to throw either school into the “battles” category that implies a 50/50 outcome.
So long as Clay Helton and Lynn Swan are providing leadership at USC, the window to best USC is open. CU fans deserve to go nuts when the Buffs finally beat the Trojans. I really hope that 2019 is the year. The Hill will RAWK into the wee hours after that one.
Of course Chip Kelly has a poor outing at his first year with the Bruins. This is enough to also believe this game
might be stolen on the road.
What got us into this discussion is on the notion that CU isn’t the only team on the schedule with talent and depth issues.
Is it correct to infer from your inclusion of USC and UCLA into the “battles” category that both schools are also struggling with talent and depth issues?
From my perspective, both schools have talent and depth advantages over CU based on their recruiting.
But I hope you are right about CU not being an underdog in both of those games. Yours is definitely is not a wet blanket take regrading those two schools.
Since CU beat ASU with Laviska and Montez last year, I’m more bullish on getting an ASU victory this year than you are. Although it’s in the desert this year, the Devils are missing WR standout Harry and experienced QB Wilkins. We’ll see if ASU’s skill players can take advantage of ASU’s depth at the lines.