Hansen had all day today. Pass blocking was not a problem.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
WORST OFFICIATING i've seen. 5 penalties on cu none on cal and...
- Thread starter buffsyko
- Start date
Hansen had all day today. Pass blocking was not a problem.
Yes.
It was awful. Clearly the ball wasn't tipped but of course, we didn't get that call but the refs called it on us because we can counter act gravity.
White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
Nah he got a piece of the ball.
No he did not.
Junction
Club Member
On that crystal clear FCS SD feed, I couldn't see the ball being tipped. But then again, I could barely tell if the punter was O'Neill or Bonsu, so that might not mean anything. :lol: Given the outcome of the punt, I can believe that somebody got a finger on it....
White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
Oh. I guess everyone in chat was wrong then.
The ball was tipped, but the part that confused me was that the guy who ran into O'Neill isn't the one who tipped it. I know if you tip the ball you're basically given immunity on hitting the punter, but is everyone immune from it if the ball is tipped?
White_Rabbit
Well-Known Member
:lol: I was on FCS too, it looked like he got a piece of it on there, but I deferred to people who were watching it on HD and they all said he clearly got a piece of it. Tini saw it live, though. It was most decidedly not touched and we got screwed.
Looking at it live, it looked like O'Neil kicked it to avoid the rusher. It did not appear to have the trajectory changed at all from what I saw, and I had a pretty good view of it. I was sitting behind him when he kicked it.
Depends on which happened first. You can't slam into the punter before the ball is tipped or it's roughing. You can hit him after a tipped ball.
I don't think it matters if it is a different player tipping the punt / running into the punter.
Gracias. The second guy did hit him a split second after the first one tipped it, so it was a good no-call.
I was front row but from seeing it live and in replays it looked like he did not get a piece of the ball.
And you're wrong.
Unless you're a Miami fan discussing a certain game against Ohio State. :smile2:
They had a pretty damn big impact today, and that makes a difference in an OT game.
I'm not gonna dispute that, but the game wouldn't have been as close without the officiating help. So say what you will. If PRich doesn't get shoved in the back on an out and up, maybe the game doesn't even go to OT.
YES there was almost a riot... i saw a few people being restrained in the front row of 107 it was insane!
Crosspost:
Originally Posted by Daaah 
Tough loss.
Can someone explain the roughing the passer call to me? Was it on the initial pass from the qb? Because if so, that was a lateral, not a pass. If it was on the second pass from the rb back to the qb, that was bs because they showed it on tv and no one hit the guy - plus, i think that was a lateral too.
Explanation please.
Thanks.
--------------------
It was on the rb (think it was actually a receiver)
--------------------------
Ok. So on the TV they cut back before the hit. It must have been pretty late. But was that really a forward pass back to the QB?
Tough loss.
Can someone explain the roughing the passer call to me? Was it on the initial pass from the qb? Because if so, that was a lateral, not a pass. If it was on the second pass from the rb back to the qb, that was bs because they showed it on tv and no one hit the guy - plus, i think that was a lateral too.
Explanation please.
Thanks.
--------------------
It was on the rb (think it was actually a receiver)
--------------------------
Ok. So on the TV they cut back before the hit. It must have been pretty late. But was that really a forward pass back to the QB?
whatthebuff
Club Member
Two things...Nobody could fix the ref's mic? Pretty annoying. Also, one time there was off setting penalties and they replayed the down. Another time there was off setting penalties and they did NOT replay the down. I am confused on the rules.
This second off-setting where they didn't replay the down confused me as well.
Junction
Club Member
It was called PI on Henderson. Why the officials initially called Polk's INT a catch by Cal is something they'd probably have to answer (not that they could) :lol:
K... that's somewhat reasonable. It was a marginal PI call, but probably right. If Henderson turns his head, that's an interception.
I'll await explanation on that roughing the passer call.
this
Agreed. Henderson often gets caught not looking at the ball. When he sees that receiver turning to locate and those hands start coming up to catch, he has got to get turned around to play the ball