Mick - I understand that in a certain light, it can sound dumb. But, if you feel that you have someone you can groom into a solid player, but just isn't there yet. And at the same time, you have someone that you feel can better help you win football games, why not save the project's eligibility for the future? It's all opinion- who knows what the coaches are thinking, but I think that this is Cody's last year. Next year will be Hansen or Evans, and after that, who knows.
BuffFan - I don't understand how you can seriously state that Hansen wasn't given a fair shot. You're calling for Cody's job in the "first half of the first game", and yet you think Hansen's playing time last year needed to be extended. I understand you were probably exaggerating (hopefully at least) and that Cody has a few years of less-than-stellar performance. But Hansen has done nothing in games or practices to show he's better for CU. Hawkins is not to blame for our horrible start. Yes, he hasn't been great, but neither has our play selection, defensive game plan, or overall team play.
The stats - okay, Cody may have only been 5% better completing throws, but come on...do you not remember Hansen looking really tentative out there, getting ready to run as soon as the slightest hint of pressure came? Cody was better for the team last season - ISU clearly showed that. I think he's better for us this year too. (if you want a threat on the ground, BJax was way better in that regard...you want him back there?)
I understand all of your gripes about Cody, but I do not think that unfairly bashing him is warranted. This thread hasn't done that, but other ones have. I do think his criticism is heightened because of his father being the coach. He's the best we have right now...it sucks, but he is. We might as well support him. We don't have to be sunshine pumpers, but start chanting "Tyler Hansen" when our entire team is underperforming??