What's new
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!

2023 Pac 12 Tourney thread- #9 seed MEN'S bball (Las Vegas; 2nd round game vs. #1 seed/ #2 ranked UCLA, Thursday, 3/9, 1:00 PM MT, Pac 12 Networks)

He was standing still and yelling. No ref should throw an elbow.
Just saw a replay. The ref was doing his job. Don’t take that as me defending the ref for anything else. But Tad was obviously pissed at the other ref and needed to be restrained. And good for him.
 
In all my years on this site, I don’t think I’ve ever said one thing about the refs … but holy ****. The amount of phantom calls UCLA got is criminal. It’s a total joke. I don’t believe in conspiracy that the league wants UCLA to win but I think it’s gross incompetence. Absolutely impacted the game. UCLA has more firepower and made more plays down the stretch but ****, we can’t play against the refs too. Glad to see Tad get tossed.

All you experts (buffs233 and others) that said Hammond still doesn’t belong after the previous two great games, what’s your assessment now? Went toe to toe with Tyger. The guy has more than proved he can play and with a good off season, could really become dangerous next year. I like the idea of Hammond at PG and KJ at the 2.

Nique needs to hit the portal today. Total liability the likes of which we haven’t seen from a starter in quite awhile. Go be Treshaun Fletcher somewhere else.
This.
 
Serious question: if/when UCLA goes to the Big Ten and AZ goes to the Big 12, how many more conference games do they lose because the conference refs won't be conditioned to give them the benefit of the doubt on every call?

We've bitched about Pac-12 refs being ****ty in basketball and football for as long as we've been in the conference, but it's seemed like random ****tiness except for when UCLA and AZ basketball are involved. Then the ****tiness invariably slants one way. I'm not just talking about us, either. I honestly feel like the refs just systematically give the benefit of the doubt to those teams in every game.
I think it's a simple human nature thing. These refs want the 'best' team from their league to advance. A lot cooler to ref in the league that produced the NC, then in the MAC. ucla and az have always been the best teams, and the league (and refs) want them to get max glory. Likely not a conscious thing, but 31 versus 11 attempts doesn't reflect the reality of this game at all.
 
Tad quote:

“We didn’t lose this game because of officiating. To me, the difference in the game was our inability to get to the free-throw line, okay? Our inability to get to the free-throw line was the difference in the game, and our turnovers because when you drive on UCLA, they are very, very active with their hands. … So the activity with their hands on drives and our inability to get to the free-throw line, I thought was a big, big part of that game. Take away the four points they got on me, it was a seven-point game. Our guys, again, they scratched, and they fought, and they clawed, but we couldn’t get to the freethrow line.”

I think he threw in the “we didn’t lose because of officiating” line to appease the Pac 12 officials. The rest of his quote seems, to me at least, to say “we lost because of the officiating.” :LOL:
 
Last edited:
Tad quote:

“We didn’t lose this game because of officiating. To me, the difference in the game was our inability to get to the freethrow line, okay?” Boyle said. “Our inability to get to the free-throw line was the difference in the game, and our turnovers because when you drive on UCLA, they are very, very active with their hands. … So the activity with their hands on drives and our inability to get to the free-throw line, I thought was a big, big part of that game. Take away the four points they got on me, it was a seven-point game. Our guys, again, they scratched, and they fought, and they clawed, but we couldn’t get to the freethrow line.”

I think he threw in the “we didn’t lose because of officiating” line to appease the Pac 12 officials. The rest of his quote seems, to me at least, to say “we lost because of the officiating.” :LOL:
It's just amazing how UCLA is able to cleanly reach in while avoiding contact, even body contact. It's also amazing how on the other end they're able to protect the ball and angle their bodies just right to draw foul calls. And most amazing is that the officials are so great that they're able to recognize this subtle difference in real time and put UCLA on the FT line 3 times as much as Colorado. We were truly blessed to witness greatness from that officiating crew yesterday while UCLA schooled us on how to play within the rules.
 
It's just amazing how UCLA is able to cleanly reach in while avoiding contact, even body contact. It's also amazing how on the other end they're able to protect the ball and angle their bodies just right to draw foul calls. And most amazing is that the officials are so great that they're able to recognize this subtle difference in real time and put UCLA on the FT line 3 times as much as Colorado. We were truly blessed to witness greatness from that officiating crew yesterday while UCLA schooled us on how to play within the rules.
We are still the +1 at the ball in the PAC12, so no need to stay with refs like last night.
Even Jacquez last drive was a foul on him with an arm clear out of Wright, or even just a no-call from the crap ass ref would save face
 
People accept that refs aren't truly neutral in BB, probably in other sports too. Certain NBA, and college, players are protected. Certain players can take an extra step going to the hoop. Certain schools get the advantages you can't always quantify.
 
The one I have in mind is the guy cutting around LL. LL was stationary and the guy “trips” over his foot and goes down, arms flailing. Foul on LL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wip
It always strikes me in the NBA when there is a huge discrepancy in free throws in a first half, by the ends of games it all evens out. In the NCAA, and I have zero proof, there seem to be a lot more games with big FT discrepancies for an entire game. And, obviously, some of that is due to “intentional” fouls at the ends of games.
 
It always strikes me in the NBA when there is a huge discrepancy in free throws in a first half, by the ends of games it all evens out. In the NCAA, and I have zero proof, there seem to be a lot more games with big FT discrepancies for an entire game. And, obviously, some of that is due to “intentional” fouls at the ends of games.
When a team is attacking the rim more, it should go to the line more. When a team is going for more blocks & steals, it should get called for more fouls (and vice versa).

Putting those 2 things together (Tadball concepts of attacking the glass & playing position defense), CU generally gets to the line more than its opponents.

You're going to get fewer 50/50 calls on the road. You're going to get the benefit more often if you're a veteran player with whom the refs are familiar. That's life in basketball. It doesn't explain yesterday. Neutral game & TDS didn't get his share of calls.

What happened yesterday was egregious.
 
When a team is attacking the rim more, it should go to the line more. When a team is going for more blocks & steals, it should get called for more fouls (and vice versa).

Putting those 2 things together (Tadball concepts of attacking the glass & playing position defense), CU generally gets to the line more than its opponents.

You're going to get fewer 50/50 calls on the road. You're going to get the benefit more often if you're a veteran player with whom the refs are familiar. That's life in basketball. It doesn't explain yesterday. Neutral game & TDS didn't get his share of calls.

What happened yesterday was egregious.
And a team that creates a lot of turnovers by slapping at the ball should receive a fair amount of foul calls.
 
Tad quote:

“We didn’t lose this game because of officiating. To me, the difference in the game was our inability to get to the free-throw line, okay? Our inability to get to the free-throw line was the difference in the game, and our turnovers because when you drive on UCLA, they are very, very active with their hands. … So the activity with their hands on drives and our inability to get to the free-throw line, I thought was a big, big part of that game. Take away the four points they got on me, it was a seven-point game. Our guys, again, they scratched, and they fought, and they clawed, but we couldn’t get to the freethrow line.”

I think he threw in the “we didn’t lose because of officiating” line to appease the Pac 12 officials. The rest of his quote seems, to me at least, to say “we lost because of the officiating.” :LOL:
I hate the rule that coaches and players can't criticize refs post-game or they get fined. What kind of snowflake bull**** is that? It's not like the refs are volunteers. And coaches will be careful what they say, knowing they'll have that same crew again someday. But what's the real harm in letting a coach air his grievances? The idea that the refs are above reproach is a joke.
 
People accept that refs aren't truly neutral in BB, probably in other sports too. Certain NBA, and college, players are protected. Certain players can take an extra step going to the hoop. Certain schools get the advantages you can't always quantify.
This is the fundamental flaw with the game of basketball. Of all the major sports, it’s the one that is most easily manipulated by officiating.
 
I hate the rule that coaches and players can't criticize refs post-game or they get fined. What kind of snowflake bull**** is that? It's not like the refs are volunteers. And coaches will be careful what they say, knowing they'll have that same crew again someday. But what's the real harm in letting a coach air his grievances? The idea that the refs are above reproach is a joke.
Truthfully, Tad needs to take a breath then sit down and review the tape. Then, if he has a case, document it and send it to the head of officiating. That probably won’t accomplish much other than maybe giving the officials a poor grade.

As fans we’d love to be appeased by an admission from the league that the officials failed. But that will never, ever, ever happen. And you can be assured that officials have long memories so be careful what you wish for.

The “game” is to put something into the officials heads that will favor your team the next time those guys officiate one of your games and to not piss them off.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if he will abandon the pac bandwagon in the coming years. I'd be interested to hear his thoughts on UCLA leaving.
I heard him on one broadcast talking about how he thought the PAC-12 would stay together, so I don’t think his thoughts are completely rational on the subject.
 
In all my years on this site, I don’t think I’ve ever said one thing about the refs … but holy ****. The amount of phantom calls UCLA got is criminal. It’s a total joke. I don’t believe in conspiracy that the league wants UCLA to win but I think it’s gross incompetence. Absolutely impacted the game. UCLA has more firepower and made more plays down the stretch but ****, we can’t play against the refs too. Glad to see Tad get tossed.

All you experts (buffs233 and others) that said Hammond still doesn’t belong after the previous two great games, what’s your assessment now? Went toe to toe with Tyger. The guy has more than proved he can play and with a good off season, could really become dangerous next year. I like the idea of Hammond at PG and KJ at the 2.

Nique needs to hit the portal today. Total liability the likes of which we haven’t seen from a starter in quite awhile. Go be Treshaun Fletcher somewhere else.
Michael Greenstein was on the crew for CU-UCLA.
 
Back
Top