He'd never get over him while playing leapfrogCody Hawkins nightmare.
He'd never get over him while playing leapfrogCody Hawkins nightmare.
Still in it
Was just thinking the same thing.One of these schools is nothing like the others.
So, with Harris in the mix, what is the order of priority here? Or do we take both if we have the opportunity? This kid is insanely athletic also....
Dayum.90" reach.
Please tell me more. I ask because they seem almost identical in build and overall athleticism? Would we move to a true 5-2 front and have bookends like we did with Alfred and Kanavis?I think they ultimately play different positions, so we would take both.
Faster one gets moved to safety.Please tell me more. I ask because they seem almost identical in build and overall athleticism? Would we move to a true 5-2 front and have bookends like we did with Alfred and Kanavis?
Please tell me more. I ask because they seem almost identical in build and overall athleticism? Would we move to a true 5-2 front and have bookends like we did with Alfred and Kanavis?
I love it when you guys talk dirty to me.I think Harris can be a 5 tech in time. Ivey is more of the true 3-4 DE/OLB.
But if they both end up at OLB, that works too.
When you have what looks like impact talent, guys who can win one on one battles and change plays on their own you take them both and figure out how to use them.I think Harris can be a 5 tech in time. Ivey is more of the true 3-4 DE/OLB.
But if they both end up at OLB, that works too.
So, with Harris in the mix, what is the order of priority here? Or do we take both if we have the opportunity? This kid is insanely athletic also....
That is an outstanding analogy, except for the troglodytes that don’t understand scotch. They require grunts and snorts.Imagine you have a glass, and the bartender is pouring Johnnie Walker Blue, on the house.
Now imagine saying, “when.”
You never say “when” when the bartender is pouring top shelf pass rushers.
In regards to your beatifully illustrated point, I am in 100% agreement. In regards to your analogy, I was simply asking the question because it seems (following this weekend) our glass is about to runneth over (the 25 scholly limit). It would be an amazing "problem" to have, and I am excited to see how the rest of this all plays out.Imagine you have a glass, and the bartender is pouring Johnnie Walker Blue, on the house.
Now imagine saying, “when.”
You never say “when” when the bartender is pouring top shelf pass rushers.
That is an outstanding analogy, except for the troglodytes that don’t understand scotch. They require grunts and snorts.
You have been misled.I understand that JW Blue is just an overpriced blend created to impress numbskulls.
FifyYou are missing the point.
As someone who used to drink unblended scotch, if I had to drink a blended I did’t mind JW. As of December 30th it will be 26 years since I had any alcohol.. so my memory is from awhile back.I understand that JW Blue is just an overpriced blend created to impress numbskulls.
Like for 26 years of sobriety.As someone who used to drink unblended scotch, if I had to drink a blended I did’t mind JW. As of December 30th it will be 26 years since I had any alcohol.. so my memory is from awhile back.
In regards to your beatifully illustrated point, I am in 100% agreement. In regards to your analogy, I was simply asking the question because it seems (following this weekend) our glass is about to runneth over (the 25 scholly limit). It would be an amazing "problem" to have, and I am excited to see how the rest of this all plays out.